CVE-2024-32537
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedCross-Site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in joshuae1974 Flash Video Player allows Cross Site Request Forgery.This issue affects Flash Video Player: from n/a through 5.0.4.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceCross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in the joshuae1974 Flash Video Player plugin (versions up to 5.0.4). The plugin lacks proper anti-CSRF token validation on state-changing operations, allowing authenticated users to unknowingly execute unintended actions such as modifying player settings or configuration through maliciously crafted requests.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- Required
- Scope
- Changed
- Confidentiality
- Low
- Integrity
- Low
- Availability
- Low
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:L
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Locate the Flash Video Player plugin filesCheck the WordPress plugins directory (wp-content/plugins/) for a folder named 'flash-video-player' or similar. Use file system commands like 'ls' or 'find' to locate the plugin files.Affected if The plugin files are present in the WordPress installation
-
Determine the installed plugin versionOpen the main plugin PHP file (often named index.php, flash-video-player.php, or similar) and locate the version comment or Version header in the plugin metadata. Look for a line like 'Version: x.x.x' or check the plugin readme.txt file.Affected if The version number is 5.0.4 or lower (any version up to and including 5.0.4)
-
Confirm the plugin is activeIn the WordPress admin dashboard, navigate to Plugins > Installed Plugins and verify that the Flash Video Player plugin shows as 'Active', or query the WordPress database options table for the active_plugins option.Affected if The plugin is activated on the WordPress site
-
Identify state-changing operationsReview the plugin PHP files for form submissions and AJAX handlers. Look for $_POST, $_GET, or $_REQUEST handling that modifies settings, configuration, or player options. Search for functions that update_options, insert_post, file_put_contents, or database write operations.Affected if The plugin contains POST/PUT/DELETE handlers that modify settings or configuration
-
Verify absence of CSRF token validationExamine the identified state-changing code paths. Search for wp_nonce_field, wp_verify_nonce, check_ajax_referer, or other nonce verification functions within the form handling and AJAX endpoints. Verify if these checks are missing or improperly implemented.Affected if State-changing operations lack proper nonce/token verification or the validation is bypassed
A user is affected if the Flash Video Player plugin version 5.0.4 or lower is installed, activated, and contains state-changing operations that do not validate anti-CSRF tokens.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataImplement synchronized token pattern by generating unique anti-CSRF tokens for each user session and validating them on all POST/PUT/DELETE requests, combined with SameSite cookie attributes and Origin/Referrer header validation.
- Consultation1.0 h
- Implementation3.0 h
- Testing2.0 h
- Review / QA1.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $1,952.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2024-32537 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2024-32537 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data