Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF)Weakness · CWE-352

CVE-2024-32538

MEDIUM · 6.5 CVSS v3.1 Published 2024-04-17
Mitigation only
No fix yet — a mitigation exists. There is no fixed release. A documented workaround reduces exposure in the meantime.
See remediation →
69/100
Remediation priority · Elevated
Remotely reachable

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Joshua Eldridge Easy CountDowner allows Stored XSS.This issue affects Easy CountDowner: from n/a through 1.0.8.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · moderate confidence

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in the Easy CountDowner WordPress plugin allows unauthenticated attackers to trick administrators into performing actions that result in Stored XSS. The lack of proper CSRF token validation enables attackers to inject malicious JavaScript through forged requests.

MitigationUpdate Easy CountDowner to the latest patched version. Additionally, implement WordPress nonce tokens for all state-changing admin actions to prevent CSRF exploitation.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Privileges
Low
User interaction
Required
Scope
Changed
Confidentiality
Low
Integrity
Low
Availability
Low

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:L

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Identify if Easy CountDowner plugin is installed
    Go to WordPress admin dashboard > Plugins and look for 'Easy CountDowner' in the installed plugins list, or check the /wp-content/plugins/ directory for the easy-countdowner folder
    Affected if The plugin is installed and active on the WordPress site
  2. Determine the installed plugin version
    In the plugins list, click on the plugin to view details, or check the main plugin file (usually easy-countdowner.php) for the 'Version' header in the plugin comment block
    Affected if The version number is lower than the patched version (you must compare to the vendor's official advisory for the exact version range)
  3. Inspect plugin admin pages for stored XSS
    Navigate to the Easy CountDowner settings pages in the WordPress admin (typically under Settings or a dedicated Easy CountDowner menu) and view the page source or inspect form fields for suspicious script tags or encoded JavaScript
    Affected if Malicious JavaScript or HTML script tags are present in any countdown timer configuration fields
  4. Check plugin code for CSRF protection
    Examine the plugin's PHP files that handle form submissions (look for admin-post.php handlers or form processing code) and verify if wp_nonce_field() or check_admin_referer() are used on state-changing actions
    Affected if Form submissions in the plugin lack nonce token verification or use nonces incorrectly (e.g., missing verification before processing)
  5. Review admin action logs if available
    Check WordPress audit logs, server access logs, or security plugins for suspicious POST requests to admin-ajax.php or admin-post.php with Easy CountDowner handlers originating from external referrers

You are affected if Easy CountDowner is installed, the version is below the patched release, and either malicious scripts are already stored in plugin settings or admin form actions lack CSRF token validation.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

From vendor data
Mitigation available No clean upgrade yet — mitigate in the meantime
Mitigation

Update Easy CountDowner to the latest patched version. Additionally, implement WordPress nonce tokens for all state-changing admin actions to prevent CSRF exploitation.

Have this fixed Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation2.0 h
  • Implementation4.0 h
  • Testing2.0 h
  • Review / QA1.0 h
9.0 hours of engineering $1,600
Get help mitigating

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $2,560.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2024-32538 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2024-32538 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data