CVE-2024-32619
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedHDF5 Library through 1.14.3 contains a heap-based buffer overflow in H5T_copy_reopen in H5T.c, resulting in the corruption of the instruction pointer.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceHeap-based buffer overflow in H5T_copy_reopen function in H5T.c in HDF5 Library through 1.14.3 allows corruption of the instruction pointer, potentially enabling arbitrary code execution via specially crafted HDF5 files.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data< 1.14.4CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Local
- Complexity
- High
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify installed HDF5 library versionRun 'h5dump --version' or check your package manager for hdf5 version, or inspect the library file libhdf5.so and check its version metadataAffected if version is below 1.14.4 (any version from 1.14.0 through 1.14.3, or unversioned builds)
Affected if HDF5 version is below 1.14.4 and untrusted HDF5 files are processed using H5Tcopy or similar datatype copy operations.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped1.14.4
Upgrade HDF5 Library to version 1.14.4 or later. If immediate upgrade is not feasible, sanitize or reject untrusted HDF5 files before processing and disable datatype copy operations where possible.
1.14.4
- 1. Identify all applications and systems that link against the HDF5 library in your environment
- 2. Locate the currently installed HDF5 library version (typically found in /usr/lib, /usr/local/lib, or via pkg-config --modversion hdf5)
- 3. Consult your system's package manager or build system to obtain HDF5 version 1.14.4 or later
- 4. Upgrade the HDF5 library to version 1.14.4 or newer
- 5. Rebuild any applications statically linked against HDF5 to ensure they use the fixed library
- 6. Verify the new version is correctly installed and loaded (h5dump --version or similar tool can confirm)
- 7. Test that dependent applications function correctly with the upgraded library
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation6.0 h
- Implementation5.0 h
- Testing5.0 h
- Review / QA3.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $5,424.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2024-32619 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2024-32619 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data