Hdf5Application · Hdfgroup

CVE-2024-32624

HIGH · 7.4 CVSS v3.1 Published 2024-05-14
Fix available
A fix is available. Upgrade to 1.14.4 or later.
See remediation →
83/100
Remediation priority · High
Remotely reachable No privileges Zero-click

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
HDF5 Library through 1.14.3 contains a heap-based buffer overflow in H5T__ref_mem_setnull in H5Tref.c (called from H5T__conv_ref in H5Tconv.c), resulting in the corruption of the instruction pointer.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · high confidence

Heap-based buffer overflow in HDF5 Library's reference type conversion logic (H5T__ref_mem_setnull in H5Tref.c) allows corruption of the instruction pointer, potentially enabling arbitrary code execution when processing specially crafted HDF5 files.

MitigationUpgrade HDF5 Library to version 1.14.4 or later; until then, restrict processing of untrusted HDF5 files and monitor for exploits.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.

NVD · CPE data
Hdf5Application
Affected:< 1.14.4

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
High
Privileges
None
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
High
Availability
None

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Locate the installed HDF5 library
    Search for HDF5 library files on the system: find /usr -name '*hdf5*' 2>/dev/null or check package manager: dpkg -l | grep hdf5 or rpm -qa | grep hdf5
    Affected if HDF5 library is present on the system
  2. Determine the installed HDF5 version
    Run: h5dump --version or check the library file version directly using strings or a library inspection tool
    Affected if The version displayed is less than 1.14.4 (for example, 1.14.3, 1.14.2, 1.12.x, etc.)
  3. Identify applications using HDF5
    Search for applications linked against HDF5: ldd <application> | grep hdf5 or check for HDF5 dependencies in application manifests
    Affected if Applications process untrusted HDF5 files and link to a vulnerable HDF5 version below 1.14.4
  4. Inspect HDF5 file processing workflows
    Review logs or trace files for HDF5 file operations, particularly those involving reference type datasets (H5T_REFERENCE)
    Affected if The environment processes HDF5 files that could contain specially crafted reference type data

A system is affected if HDF5 Library version 1.14.4 or later is NOT installed and the system processes untrusted HDF5 files using reference type conversion functionality.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

dbcve · scoped
Upgrade available Upgrade to 1.14.4 or later
Fixed in 1.14.4
Interim mitigation

Upgrade HDF5 Library to version 1.14.4 or later; until then, restrict processing of untrusted HDF5 files and monitor for exploits.

Recommended fix High confidence

1.14.4

  1. Identify all systems, applications, or containers running HDF5 library versions prior to 1.14.4
  2. Backup any critical data or configurations that rely on HDF5
  3. Upgrade HDF5 library to version 1.14.4 or later
  4. Rebuild or recompile any applications that link against the HDF5 library to use the new version
  5. Restart any services or applications that use the HDF5 library
  6. Verify the upgrade was successful by checking the HDF5 version
Caveat Review application compatibility with HDF5 1.14.4 as minor API/behavior changes may exist

Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.

Fix this in Hdf5 Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation2.0 h
  • Implementation4.0 h
  • Testing8.0 h
  • Review / QA2.0 h
16.0 hours of engineering $2,680
Get the upgrade done

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $4,288.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2024-32624 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2024-32624 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data