CVE-2024-32637
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedA vulnerability has been identified in JT2Go (All versions < V2312.0005), Teamcenter Visualization V14.2 (All versions < V14.2.0.12), Teamcenter Visualization V14.3 (All versions < V14.3.0.10), Teamcenter Visualization V2312 (All versions < V2312.0005). The affected applications contain a null pointer dereference vulnerability while parsing specially crafted X_T files. An attacker could leverage this vulnerability to crash the application causing denial of service condition.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceA null pointer dereference vulnerability exists in JT2Go and Teamcenter Visualization products when parsing specially crafted X_T files. The vulnerability can be triggered by a user opening a malicious X_T file, causing the application to crash and resulting in a denial of service condition.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data>= 2312.0, < 2312.0005>= 35.0, < 35.1.256>= 36.0, < 36.0.208>= 36.1, < 36.1.173>= 14.2, < 14.2.0.12>= 14.3, < 14.3.0.10>= 2312.0, < 2312.0005CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Local
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- Required
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- None
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify installed JT2Go versionLocate the JT2Go installation directory and check the product version information (typically in the application properties, about dialog, or version file within the program folder)Affected if The installed version is >= 2312.0 and < 2312.0005
-
Identify installed Teamcenter Visualization versionCheck the Teamcenter Visualization product version through the application, installer properties, or version metadata in the installation directoryAffected if The installed version falls within any of these ranges: >= 14.2 and < 14.2.0.12, OR >= 14.3 and < 14.3.0.10, OR >= 2312.0 and < 2312.0005
-
Identify installed Parasolid versionCheck the Parasolid version if installed as a standalone component or embedded library (check version file, or query through the host application that uses Parasolid)Affected if The installed version falls within any of these ranges: >= 35.0 and < 35.1.256, OR >= 36.0 and < 36.0.208, OR >= 36.1 and < 36.1.173
-
Confirm X_T file parsing capability is presentVerify that the product has the ability to import or open X_T files (this is a built-in feature; if the product supports X_T format, the vulnerable parsing code is present)Affected if The product can parse X_T files and the version check in steps 1-3 shows an affected version
You are affected if you have any of the affected products (JT2Go, Teamcenter Visualization, or Parasolid) installed with a version matching the affected ranges AND the product includes X_T file parsing functionality.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped14.2.0.1214.3.0.1035.1.256
Update affected products to the patched versions: JT2Go and Teamcenter Visualization V2312 to V2312.0005, Teamcenter Visualization V14.2 to V14.2.0.12, and Teamcenter Visualization V14.3 to V14.3.0.10.
JT2Go: V2312.0005 | Teamcenter Visualization: V14.2.0.12, V14.3.0.10, or V2312.0005 (depending on branch) | Parasolid: V35.1.256, V36.0.208, or V36.1.173 (depending on branch)
- 1. Identify the specific affected product(s) in your environment: JT2Go, Parasolid, and/or Teamcenter Visualization
- 2. For JT2Go: Upgrade to version 2312.0005 or later
- 3. For Teamcenter Visualization V14.2: Upgrade to version 14.2.0.12 or later
- 4. For Teamcenter Visualization V14.3: Upgrade to version 14.3.0.10 or later
- 5. For Teamcenter Visualization V2312: Upgrade to version 2312.0005 or later
- 6. For Parasolid V35.x: Upgrade to version 35.1.256 or later
- 7. For Parasolid V36.0.x: Upgrade to version 36.0.208 or later
- 8. For Parasolid V36.1.x: Upgrade to version 36.1.173 or later
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation4.0 h
- Testing3.0 h
- Review / QA1.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $2,800.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2024-32637 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2024-32637 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data