CVE-2024-32668
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedAn insufficient boundary validation in the USB code could lead to an out-of-bounds write on the heap, with data controlled by the caller. A malicious, privileged software running in a guest VM can exploit the vulnerability to achieve code execution on the host in the bhyve userspace process, which typically runs as root. Note that bhyve runs in a Capsicum sandbox, so malicious code is constrained by the capabilities available to the bhyve process.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceA heap-based out-of-bounds write vulnerability exists in bhyve's USB code due to insufficient boundary validation. A malicious, privileged guest VM can trigger this flaw to achieve code execution on the host within the bhyve userspace process, which typically runs as root. The Capsicum sandbox constrains the impact by limiting available capabilities.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data>= 13.0, < 13.3= 13.3= 13.4= 14.0= 14.1CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Local
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- High
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Changed
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify FreeBSD host versionRun `freebsd-version -k` or `uname -r` to get the kernel versionAffected if The version is any of: 13.0, 13.1, 13.2, 13.3, 13.4, 14.0, or 14.1 (versions 13.0 through 14.1 inclusive are affected, except 13.3 which is also affected per the '=' notation)
-
Verify bhyve is installedRun `which bhyve` or check for the bhyve binary at `/usr/sbin/bhyve`Affected if bhyve is installed on the system (the vulnerability exists in the bhyve binary itself)
-
Identify VMs using USB passthroughReview VM configuration files in `/var/vm/` or wherever VM configs are stored, looking for USB device entries (such as '-s x,x,ehci' or '-s x,x,xhci' USB controller lines, or USB device mappings)Affected if Any VM configuration includes USB controller or device passthrough (the USB emulation code containing the flaw is only invoked when USB passthrough is configured for a guest)
-
Check for running bhyve processes with USB hardwareRun `ps aux | grep bhyve` and examine command-line arguments for USB-related flags or review VM runtime configurationsAffected if Any bhyve process is currently running with USB hardware passed to a guest VM (the vulnerable code path is active)
-
Review USB device assignment logsCheck system logs (via `dmesg` or `/var/log/messages`) for USB device attachment events to bhyve guests, or examine bhyve audit logs if enabledAffected if USB devices have been attached to guest VMs (indicating the vulnerable USB emulation code has been exercised)
A system is affected if it runs any FreeBSD version from 13.0 through 14.1 inclusive, has bhyve installed, and has at least one VM configured with USB passthrough enabled.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped13.3
Apply the vendor patch for CVE-2024-32668 to the bhyve hypervisor. Until patched, minimize exposure by restricting USB passthrough to untrusted guests and monitoring for suspicious VM activity.
FreeBSD 14.1 or FreeBSD 13.5 (whichever branch is applicable)
- 1. Identify the current FreeBSD version using 'freebsd-version -u' or 'uname -a'
- 2. For systems running FreeBSD 14.0: Upgrade to FreeBSD 14.1 or later stable release
- 3. For systems running FreeBSD 13.3 or 13.4: Upgrade to FreeBSD 13.5 or later (or 14.1)
- 4. For systems running 13.0-13.2: Upgrade to FreeBSD 13.5 or later (or 14.1)
- 5. After upgrade, verify the bhyve process is updated by checking 'pkg info bhyve' or reviewing the changelog for security fixes
- 6. Ensure the system is rebooted or bhyve is restarted to load the patched binaries
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation8.0 h
- Testing8.0 h
- Review / QA4.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $6,656.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2024-32668 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2024-32668 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data