dbcve.org
PowerpanelApplication · Cyberpower

CVE-2024-32737

HIGH · 7.5 CVSS v3.1 Published 2024-05-14
Fix available
A fix is available. Upgrade to 2.8.3 or later.
See remediation →
84/100
Remediation priority · High
Remotely reachable No privileges Zero-click

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
A sql injection vulnerability exists in CyberPower PowerPanel Enterprise prior to v2.8.3. An unauthenticated remote attacker can leak sensitive information via the "query_contract_result" function within MCUDBHelper.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · moderate confidence

SQL injection vulnerability in CyberPower PowerPanel Enterprise (prior to v2.8.3) in the query_contract_result function of MCUDBHelper allows unauthenticated remote attackers to extract sensitive data from the backend database.

MitigationUpgrade to PowerPanel Enterprise v2.8.3 or later. If immediate patching is not possible, restrict network access to the affected interface using firewall rules or network segmentation.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.

NVD · CPE data
PowerpanelApplication
Affected:< 2.8.3

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Privileges
None
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
None
Availability
None

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Identify installed PowerPanel Enterprise version
    Locate the PowerPanel Enterprise installation and check the version number. This is typically accessible through the web interface login page, the software itself, or system inventory. Common locations include the application metadata, service information, or the control panel.
    Affected if version is below 2.8.3 (any version prior to 2.8.3 is affected)
  2. Confirm MCUDBHelper component presence
    The vulnerability exists in the MCUDBHelper component which handles database operations. This component is part of the PowerPanel Enterprise backend and processes queries for the web interface.
    Affected if the MCUDBHelper component is present and handles query_contract_result function calls
  3. Verify web interface accessibility
    Since this is an unauthenticated remote SQL injection, determine if the PowerPanel Enterprise web interface is network-accessible. Check firewall rules, network exposure, and whether the interface binds to external interfaces.
    Affected if the web interface is reachable from network locations (the flaw is exploitable without authentication)

You are affected if PowerPanel Enterprise version is below 2.8.3 AND the web interface is accessible to network attackers, since the SQL injection in query_contract_result requires no authentication.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

dbcve · scoped
Upgrade available Upgrade to 2.8.3 or later
Fixed in 2.8.3
Interim mitigation

Upgrade to PowerPanel Enterprise v2.8.3 or later. If immediate patching is not possible, restrict network access to the affected interface using firewall rules or network segmentation.

Recommended fix High confidence

PowerPanel Enterprise v2.8.3

  1. Verify current PowerPanel Enterprise version by logging into the admin interface or checking system information
  2. Download PowerPanel Enterprise v2.8.3 or later from the official CyberPower website (www.cyberpower.com) or authorized distribution channel
  3. Review CyberPower's official upgrade documentation for PowerPanel Enterprise
  4. Execute the upgrade following the documented upgrade procedure, typically involving running the installer or using the built-in update mechanism
  5. After upgrade, verify the new version is 2.8.3 or later
  6. Confirm the MCUDBHelper query_contract_result function is no longer vulnerable to SQL injection

Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.

Fix this in Powerpanel Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation3.0 h
  • Implementation4.0 h
  • Testing6.0 h
  • Review / QA3.0 h
16.0 hours of engineering $2,760
Get the upgrade done

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $4,416.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2024-32737 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

Get it on GitHub Scan in the browser

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2024-32737 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data