CVE-2024-32758
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedUnder certain circumstances the communication between exacqVision Client and exacqVision Server will use insufficient key length and exchange
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceInsufficient key length and weak key exchange in exacqVision Client-Server communication allows attackers to potentially intercept or decrypt sensitive video management data under certain conditions.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data< 24.06< 24.06CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify exacqVision installationCheck if exacqVision Client or Server software is installed on the system. Look for exacqVision in installed programs (Windows) or package lists (Linux).Affected if exacqVision software is present on the system
-
Determine installed versionCheck the installed version of exacqVision Client or Server. On Windows, this is typically available in Add/Remove Programs or the software's About section. On Linux, check the installed package version using the system package manager.Affected if the installed version is less than 24.06 (for example, 24.03, 23.x, or earlier)
-
Identify installed component typeDetermine whether the installed instance is a Client, Server, or both (hybrid installation). Check the software designation in the installation or documentation.Affected if the system is running exacqVision Client or Server versions below 24.06
-
Verify network exposureAssess whether the exacqVision Client-Server communication occurs over untrusted networks. Check network configuration and determine if communication traverses network boundaries.Affected if Client-Server communication occurs over untrusted or external networks without VPN or TLS tunneling
You are affected if exacqVision Client or Server version below 24.06 is installed and exposed over networks where interception is possible.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped24.06
Apply vendor patch for CVE-2024-32758; until patched, use VPN or TLS tunneling for all exacqVision Client-Server communication to mitigate the weak cryptographic protection.
24.06
- Upgrade Exacqvision Client to version 24.06 or later
- Upgrade Exacqvision Server to version 24.06 or later
- Restart both client and server services to apply the update
- Verify the communication between client and server is functioning properly after upgrade
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation3.0 h
- Implementation4.0 h
- Testing4.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,648.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2024-32758 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2024-32758 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data