Missing AuthorizationWeakness · CWE-862

CVE-2024-32810

HIGH · 7.6 CVSS v3.1 Published 2024-05-03
Mitigation only
No fix yet — a mitigation exists. There is no fixed release. A documented workaround reduces exposure in the meantime.
See remediation →
82/100
Remediation priority · High
Remotely reachable Zero-click

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
Missing Authorization vulnerability in ShortPixel ShortPixel Critical CSS.This issue affects ShortPixel Critical CSS: from n/a through 1.0.2.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · moderate confidence

Missing Authorization vulnerability in ShortPixel Critical CSS plugin allows unauthorized users to access certain functionality without proper permission checks. This affects versions up to 1.0.2, potentially enabling attackers to perform privileged actions they should not have access to.

MitigationUpdate to the latest version of ShortPixel Critical CSS when available, and implement proper authorization checks (nonce verification, capability checks, user authentication) before executing sensitive operations.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Privileges
Low
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
Low
Integrity
High
Availability
Low

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:H/A:L

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Locate ShortPixel Critical CSS plugin installation
    Check WordPress plugins directory (wp-content/plugins/) for the shortpixel-critical-css folder, or query installed plugins via wp-cli: wp plugin list --search=shortpixel
    Affected if The plugin folder shortpixel-critical-css exists in the plugins directory
  2. Determine installed plugin version
    Read the plugin main file header (e.g., shortpixel-critical-css.php) to find the 'Version:' comment, or use wp-cli: wp plugin get shortpixel-critical-css --field=version
    Affected if The reported version is 1.0.2 or any version lower (e.g., 1.0.1, 1.0.0, below 1.0.2)
  3. Verify WordPress user role configuration
    Check WordPress users table or use wp user list --role=administrator to confirm which user roles exist and their capabilities
    Affected if Any user roles other than Administrator have access to plugin functionality (visible in wp-admin under ShortPixel or related menus)
  4. Inspect plugin AJAX/action endpoints
    Examine plugin PHP files for registered admin actions (add_action calls with 'wp_ajax_' hooks) and check if they include nonce verification and capability checks (current_user_can)
    Affected if Plugin PHP files contain AJAX handlers or admin action callbacks that lack current_user_can() capability checks or wp_verify_nonce() validation
  5. Review plugin access controls
    Scan plugin source code for permission/capability checks before executing sensitive operations: grep -r 'current_user_can' or grep -r 'nonce' within the plugin directory
    Affected if No current_user_can() checks are found before sensitive operations, or nonce verification is missing in action handlers

User is affected if ShortPixel Critical CSS plugin version 1.0.2 or below is installed and the plugin exposes functionality without proper capability or authentication checks.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

From vendor data
Mitigation available No clean upgrade yet — mitigate in the meantime
Mitigation

Update to the latest version of ShortPixel Critical CSS when available, and implement proper authorization checks (nonce verification, capability checks, user authentication) before executing sensitive operations.

Have this fixed Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation2.0 h
  • Implementation4.0 h
  • Testing3.0 h
  • Review / QA2.0 h
11.0 hours of engineering $1,930
Get help mitigating

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,088.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2024-32810 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2024-32810 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data