CVE-2024-32863
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedUnder certain circumstances the exacqVision Web Services may be susceptible to Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF)
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceThe exacqVision Web Services is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) under certain circumstances. This allows attackers to trick authenticated users into unknowingly submitting malicious requests to the web service, potentially performing unauthorized actions on behalf of the victim.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data<= 24.03CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- Required
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Verify exacqVision Web Service is installedCheck for exacqVision installation directories, running services, or installed programs on the systemAffected if exacqVision Web Service is present on the system
-
Determine installed exacqVision versionLocate version information in the software, typically found in About dialogs, installation logs, or system configuration filesAffected if The installed version is 24.03 or any earlier version
-
Confirm web service is accessibleIdentify open ports associated with exacqVision web interface (commonly ports 80/443 or custom ports)Affected if The exacqVision web service port is exposed and reachable from network endpoints
-
Verify authentication is enabledCheck if the web service requires authentication for state-changing operationsAffected if Users can authenticate to the web interface, making CSRF attacks possible against authenticated sessions
-
Assess CSRF protection presenceInspect the web application responses for anti-CSRF tokens on state-changing forms, or check if SameSite cookie attributes are setAffected if No anti-CSRF tokens are present in requests and SameSite cookie attributes are missing or improperly configured
You are affected if exacqVision Web Service version 24.03 or earlier is running with its web interface accessible to users who can authenticate
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scopedImplement anti-CSRF tokens for state-changing operations, validate Origin/Referer headers server-side, and configure SameSite cookie attributes to prevent cross-site request forgery attacks.
Version greater than 24.03 (contact Johnson Controls for exact fixed release)
- Upgrade the exacqVision Web Service to a version newer than 24.03
- Verify the upgrade by checking the version number in the application or system information
- Review the release notes or security advisory for the new version to confirm CSRF vulnerability is addressed
- Test the upgraded system to ensure normal functionality is maintained
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation3.0 h
- Implementation6.0 h
- Testing3.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,984.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2024-32863 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2024-32863 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data