CVE-2024-32897
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedIn ProtocolCdmaCallWaitingIndAdapter::GetCwInfo() of protocolsmsadapter.cpp, there is a possible out of bounds read due to a missing bounds check. This could lead to remote information disclosure with baseband firmware compromise required. User interaction is not needed for exploitation.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceAn out-of-bounds read vulnerability exists in ProtocolCdmaCallWaitingIndAdapter::GetCwInfo() in protocolsmsadapter.cpp due to a missing bounds check. This could allow remote information disclosure through the CDMA call waiting indication handling in baseband firmware.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE dataall versionsCVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- High
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify baseband processor vendorCheck /proc/cpuinfo or use 'getprop ro.baseband' to determine the baseband/modem processor (Qualcomm, MediaTek, etc.)Affected if The device uses a baseband processor with CDMA call waiting handling in protocolsmsadapter.cpp
-
Check if CDMA capability is presentVerify the device supports CDMA networks by checking cellular capability settings or using 'getprop ro.telephony.default_network'Affected if CDMA support is enabled - the vulnerable GetCwInfo() code path handles CDMA call waiting indications
-
Confirm baseband firmware versionQuery baseband version via 'getprop gsm.version.baseband' or check modem firmware version in system settings under About Phone > Baseband versionAffected if The installed baseband firmware version has not been patched by the vendor for CVE-2024-32897 (specific version depends on vendor)
-
Verify CDMA Call Waiting feature stateCheck if CDMA call waiting is provisioned or active on the device through phone settings or cellular network informationAffected if CDMA call waiting is enabled - the GetCwInfo() function is invoked when processing call waiting indications
A device is affected if it has a vulnerable baseband processor with CDMA call waiting capability and the baseband firmware has not been updated to include the bounds check fix in GetCwInfo().
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scopedApply vendor-provided baseband firmware updates to address the missing bounds check in GetCwInfo(). Since exploitation requires baseband firmware compromise, ensure firmware integrity verification mechanisms are in place.
- Check the Android Security Bulletin for the month this vulnerability was addressed (typically included in the monthly security patch level)
- Apply the latest Android system update from your device manufacturer that includes the security patch for this vulnerability
- Contact your device manufacturer or carrier for baseband/modem firmware updates, as this vulnerability is in the baseband component and may require a separate firmware update
- Verify the security patch level after updating: Go to Settings > About Phone > Security Patch Level and confirm it shows a date after the CVE was addressed
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation8.0 h
- Implementation16.0 h
- Testing24.0 h
- Review / QA8.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $15,232.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2024-32897 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2024-32897 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data