CVE-2024-33224
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedAn issue in the component rtkio64.sys of Realtek Semiconductor Corp Realtek lO Driver v1.008.0823.2017 allows attackers to escalate privileges and execute arbitrary code via sending crafted IOCTL requests.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceA privilege escalation vulnerability exists in the Realtek I/O Driver (rtkio64.sys) version 1.008.0823.2017. Local attackers can send crafted IOCTL (I/O Control) requests to the kernel-mode driver to escalate privileges and execute arbitrary code with kernel-level privileges.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Local
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Locate the rtkio64.sys driver fileSearch for rtkio64.sys in the Windows System32\drivers directory using File Explorer or PowerShell: Get-ChildItem -Path C:\Windows\System32\drivers -Filter rtkio64.sys -Recurse -ErrorAction SilentlyContinueAffected if The driver file exists on the system
-
Retrieve the driver file versionRight-click rtkio64.sys, select Properties, then Details to view the File Version field, or run: (Get-Item 'C:\Windows\System32\drivers\rtkio64.sys').VersionInfoAffected if The version displayed is 1.008.0823.2017
-
Check if the driver is currently loadedOpen Command Prompt as Administrator and run: sc query rtkio64 or use PowerShell: Get-Process | Where-Object {$_.Name -like '*rtk*'}Affected if The driver shows as RUNNING or a process using the driver is active
-
Compare against the affected versionCompare your retrieved version string (for example, from the File Version field) against the known affected version 1.008.0823.2017Affected if Your installed version matches or is earlier than 1.008.0823.2017 and no later patched version is confirmed
If the rtkio64.sys driver is present and its version is 1.008.0823.2017 or earlier, the system is affected by this privilege escalation vulnerability.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataUpdate the Realtek I/O Driver to a patched version once available, or restrict or disable the driver if not required for system operation.
- Consultation3.0 h
- Implementation4.0 h
- Testing4.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,648.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2024-33224 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2024-33224 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data