CVE-2024-33226
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedAn issue in the component Access64.sys of Wistron Corporation TBT Force Power Control v1.0.0.0 allows attackers to escalate privileges and execute arbitrary code via sending crafted IOCTL requests.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceA privilege escalation vulnerability exists in the Wistron Access64.sys kernel driver (TBT Force Power Control v1.0.0.0). The driver fails to properly validate or authorize IOCTL (I/O Control) requests, allowing unprivileged attackers to send crafted requests that result in arbitrary code execution with elevated SYSTEM privileges.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Changed
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- Low
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:L
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Locate the Access64.sys driver fileSearch for Access64.sys in the Windows\System32\drivers directory and any TBT Force Power Control installation foldersAffected if The driver file exists on the system
-
Verify driver is loadedRun 'sc query Access64' or 'driverquery /v | findstr Access64' from an elevated command prompt to check if the driver service is runningAffected if The driver service state shows as RUNNING
-
Check driver file versionRight-click the Access64.sys file, select Properties, and view the File Version field under the Details tabAffected if File version is 1.0.0.0 or matches the vulnerable version of TBT Force Power Control
-
Check for TBT Force Power Control softwareOpen Programs and Features in Control Panel or run 'wmic product get name,version' and look for TBT Force Power ControlAffected if TBT Force Power Control version 1.0.0.0 is installed
If Access64.sys is present and the driver or TBT Force Power Control software version is 1.0.0.0, the system is vulnerable to privilege escalation via improper IOCTL request validation.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataApply vendor-provided patch or update to TBT Force Power Control; if unavailable, disable or remove the Access64.sys driver until a fix is released.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation8.0 h
- Testing6.0 h
- Review / QA4.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $6,176.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2024-33226 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2024-33226 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data