CVE-2024-33250
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedAn issue in Open-Source Technology Committee SRS real-time video server RS/4.0.268(Leo) and SRS/4.0.195(Leo) allows a remote attacker to execute arbitrary code via a crafted request.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceA remote code execution vulnerability exists in the SRS (Simple Realtime Server) video server versions 4.0.268(Leo) and 4.0.195(Leo). Attackers can exploit this by sending specially crafted requests to the server, allowing arbitrary code execution on the affected system.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Changed
- Confidentiality
- Low
- Integrity
- Low
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify SRS versionRun the SRS binary with version flag (commonly 'srs -v' or './objs/srs -v' from the SRS installation directory) or check the server banner/response if exposed via APIAffected if The version matches exactly 4.0.268(Leo) or 4.0.195(Leo)
-
Confirm exact version numberCompare the installed version string against the affected releases. SRS versions follow a 'major.minor.patch(build)' format (e.g., 4.0.268)Affected if The installed version is 4.0.268 or 4.0.195 exactly
-
Check network exposure of SRS management interfaceInspect network listeners and firewall rules to determine if the SRS API or management port (default 1985 for API, 8080 for HTTP) is accessible from untrusted networksAffected if The SRS management or API interface is exposed to the internet or untrusted internal hosts
-
Review SRS configuration for exposed endpointsExamine the SRS configuration file (commonly srs.conf in /etc or the conf/ directory) for API or HTTP server settings that may handle specially crafted requestsAffected if HTTP API or RTMP/HTTP callbacks are enabled and reachable
You are affected if your installed SRS version is exactly 4.0.268(Leo) or 4.0.195(Leo) AND the server management interface or API is network-accessible to attackers.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataUpgrade to a patched version of SRS or apply vendor-provided security updates. If immediate patching is not feasible, restrict network access to the SRS management interface and implement network segmentation to limit exposure.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation6.0 h
- Testing4.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $4,544.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2024-33250 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2024-33250 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data