CVE-2024-33309
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedAn issue in TVS Motor Company Limited TVS Connet Android v.4.5.1 and iOS v.5.0.0 allows a remote attacker to obtain sensitive information via an insecure API endpoint. NOTE: this is disputed as discussed in the msn-official/CVE-Evidence repository.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceThe TVS Connet mobile application (Android v4.5.1 and iOS v5.0.0) contains an insecure API endpoint that allows unauthenticated remote attackers to retrieve sensitive information without proper authentication or authorization controls.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify if TVS Connect app is installed on AndroidOpen device Settings > Apps > TVS Connect, or use ADB command: adb shell pm list packages | grep -i tvsAffected if TVS Connect package is found on the device
-
Identify if TVS Connect app is installed on iOSOpen Settings > TVS Connect, or use Xcode command: idevicesyslog | grep -i tvs, or check via iTunes/FinderAffected if TVS Connect app is found on the device
-
Determine installed Android app versionNavigate to Settings > Apps > TVS Connect > App info, or use ADB: adb shell dumpsys package com.tvsconnect | grep versionNameAffected if Version is Android v4.5.1 (the affected version)
-
Determine installed iOS app versionOpen App Store > TVS Connect > App version, or go to Settings > TVS Connect > VersionAffected if Version is iOS v5.0.0 (the affected version)
-
Verify API endpoint accessibility (if applicable)Use a network proxy (e.g., Burp Suite, mitmproxy) to intercept app traffic and check if requests to the TVS Connect API endpoint lack authentication headers or tokensAffected if API requests succeed without valid authentication credentials
User is affected if TVS Connect app (Android v4.5.1 or iOS v5.0.0) is installed and communicates with the insecure API endpoint without proper authentication.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataSecure the API endpoint by implementing proper authentication (e.g., OAuth 2.0), role-based authorization checks, and ensuring all API communications occur over HTTPS with appropriate input validation.
- Consultation6.0 h
- Implementation12.0 h
- Testing6.0 h
- Review / QA4.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $7,968.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2024-33309 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2024-33309 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data