CVE-2024-33393
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedAn issue in spidernet-io spiderpool v.0.9.3 and before allows a local attacker to execute arbitrary code via a crafted command to get the token component.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidencespiderpool versions 0.9.3 and earlier contain a vulnerability in the token component where a local attacker can execute arbitrary code via a crafted command. The vulnerability allows command injection or arbitrary code execution when retrieving the token, likely due to improper input validation or unsafe command execution in the token retrieval functionality.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Local
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify spiderpool versionRun 'spiderpool --version' or check the installed package version using your system package manager (e.g., 'dpkg -l | grep spiderpool', 'rpm -qi spiderpool', or 'helm list' if installed via Helm)Affected if The installed version is 0.9.3 or earlier
-
Locate token component filesSearch for token-related files in the spiderpool installation directory - common paths include /etc/spiderpool/, /var/lib/spiderpool/, or the directory returned by 'spiderpool --config-dir'. Look for files named 'token', 'token.yaml', 'token.json', or similarAffected if Token files exist and the spiderpool version is 0.9.3 or earlier
-
Check token component statusRun 'spiderpool controller status' or 'spiderpool-agent status' to check if the token component or token retrieval feature is active. Also check for any token-related flags in the spiderpool configuration filesAffected if Token retrieval functionality is enabled and version is 0.9.3 or earlier
-
Review token-related command executionExamine spiderpool logs for token retrieval operations. Check logs in /var/log/spiderpool/ or use 'journalctl -u spiderpool' to search for token-related entries. Look for unexpected or anomalous commands in the logsAffected if Token component is in use and logs show unusual command patterns during token retrieval
A user is affected if spiderpool version 0.9.3 or earlier is installed AND the token component is enabled and actively used for token retrieval operations.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataRestrict local access to the system running spiderpool and update to a patched version once available. Review and audit the token component code for proper input sanitization and safe command execution patterns.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation4.0 h
- Testing3.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,088.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2024-33393 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2024-33393 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data