CVE-2024-33469
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedAn issue in Team Amaze Amaze File Manager v.3.8.5 and fixed in v.3.10 allows a local attacker to execute arbitrary code via the onCreate method of DatabaseViewerActivity.java.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceA local privilege escalation exists in Amaze File Manager v3.8.5 and earlier where the onCreate method of DatabaseViewerActivity.java does not properly validate input, allowing a local attacker to execute arbitrary code with the application's privileges.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Local
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Changed
- Confidentiality
- Low
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:H/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Check installed Amaze File Manager versionOpen Android Settings > Apps > Amaze File Manager, or use ADB command: `adb shell pm list packages -3 | grep amaze` then `adb shell dumpsys package <packagename> | grep versionName`Affected if Version is 3.8.5 or earlier, or version name cannot be determined (indicating outdated release)
-
Verify DatabaseViewerActivity component existsUse ADB to check if the vulnerable activity is exported: `adb shell pm dump com.amaze.filemanager | grep -A 20 DatabaseViewerActivity`Affected if The DatabaseViewerActivity component is present and accessible (check for 'exported=true' or if the activity can be launched)
User is affected if Amaze File Manager version is 3.8.5 or earlier AND the DatabaseViewerActivity feature is accessible on the device.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scopedUpgrade Amaze File Manager to v3.10 or later to obtain the security patch.
Amaze File Manager v3.10
- Upgrade Amaze File Manager from v3.8.5 to v3.10 or later
- Verify the upgrade by checking the app version in Settings > Apps > Amaze File Manager > Version
- Ensure the device is running a compatible Android version (Android 5.0+ recommended)
- After upgrade, test the Database Viewer functionality to confirm normal operation
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation1.0 h
- Testing2.0 h
- Review / QA1.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $1,696.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2024-33469 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2024-33469 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data