CVE-2024-33496
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedA vulnerability has been identified in SIMATIC RTLS Locating Manager (6GT2780-0DA00) (All versions < V3.0.1.1), SIMATIC RTLS Locating Manager (6GT2780-0DA10) (All versions < V3.0.1.1), SIMATIC RTLS Locating Manager (6GT2780-0DA20) (All versions < V3.0.1.1), SIMATIC RTLS Locating Manager (6GT2780-0DA30) (All versions < V3.0.1.1), SIMATIC RTLS Locating Manager (6GT2780-1EA10) (All versions < V3.0.1.1), SIMATIC RTLS Locating Manager (6GT2780-1EA20) (All versions < V3.0.1.1), SIMATIC RTLS Locating Manager (6GT2780-1EA30) (All versions < V3.0.1.1). Affected SIMATIC RTLS Locating Manager Report Clients do not properly protect credentials that are used to authenticate to the server. This could allow an authenticated local attacker to extract the credentials and use them to escalate their access rights from the Manager to the Systemadministrator role.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceThis vulnerability in SIMATIC RTLS Locating Manager Report Clients (multiple 6GT2780 variants) fails to properly protect authentication credentials used for server communication. An authenticated local attacker with Manager role can extract these unprotected credentials and use them to escalate privileges to Systemadministrator role.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Local
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Changed
- Confidentiality
- Low
- Integrity
- Low
- Availability
- Low
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:L
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify installed SIMATIC RTLS product variantLocate the installed SIMATIC RTLS Locating Manager Report Client and note the model number (6GT2780-x variant) in the system inventory or installed software listAffected if The product is a SIMATIC RTLS Locating Manager Report Client with a 6GT2780 model number and the version is below V3.0.1.1
-
Check installed software versionAccess the software version information through the product's about dialog, installation directory metadata, or Windows Programs and Features entry for the SIMATIC RTLS Locating Manager componentAffected if The displayed version is earlier than V3.0.1.1 (for example, V3.0.0.x or prior releases)
-
Verify Manager role access existsCheck if any local user account has Manager role privileges within the SIMATIC RTLS Locating Manager application by reviewing the user role configurationAffected if A local user with Manager role account exists and is able to log into the Locating Manager application
-
Confirm server communication is configuredReview the Locating Manager configuration to determine if server communication credentials have been stored or configured for connecting to the backend serverAffected if Server communication is enabled and credentials are stored locally in the application configuration
A user is affected if they have a SIMATIC RTLS Locating Manager Report Client (6GT2780 variant) installed with a version earlier than V3.0.1.1 and the application has server communication credentials configured for a user with Manager role access.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scopedUpgrade all affected SIMATIC RTLS Locating Manager installations to version V3.0.1.1 or later per Siemens advisory. Review and rotate any credentials that may have been exposed prior to patching.
V3.0.1.1
- Identify the specific SIMATIC RTLS Locating Manager product variant (6GT2780-0DA00, 6GT2780-0DA10, 6GT2780-0DA20, 6GT2780-0DA30, 6GT2780-1EA10, 6GT2780-1EA20, or 6GT2780-1EA30) currently deployed
- Obtain the fixed version V3.0.1.1 from Siemens via their official support channels or cert-portal.siemens.com
- Plan and schedule a maintenance window for the upgrade
- Backup all existing configuration data and credentials for the current RTLS Locating Manager installation
- Upgrade the SIMATIC RTLS Locating Manager to version V3.0.1.1 following Siemens installation documentation
- After upgrade, verify that credentials are now properly protected and cannot be extracted by local authenticated users
- Confirm the Manager to Systemadministrator role escalation vulnerability is resolved
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation8.0 h
- Testing4.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $5,120.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2024-33496 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2024-33496 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data