CVE-2024-33497
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedA vulnerability has been identified in SIMATIC RTLS Locating Manager (6GT2780-0DA00) (All versions < V3.0.1.1), SIMATIC RTLS Locating Manager (6GT2780-0DA10) (All versions < V3.0.1.1), SIMATIC RTLS Locating Manager (6GT2780-0DA20) (All versions < V3.0.1.1), SIMATIC RTLS Locating Manager (6GT2780-0DA30) (All versions < V3.0.1.1), SIMATIC RTLS Locating Manager (6GT2780-1EA10) (All versions < V3.0.1.1), SIMATIC RTLS Locating Manager (6GT2780-1EA20) (All versions < V3.0.1.1), SIMATIC RTLS Locating Manager (6GT2780-1EA30) (All versions < V3.0.1.1). Affected SIMATIC RTLS Locating Manager Track Viewer Client do not properly protect credentials that are used to authenticate to the server. This could allow an authenticated local attacker to extract the credentials and use them to escalate their access rights from the Manager to the Systemadministrator role.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceThe SIMATIC RTLS Locating Manager Track Viewer Client stores authentication credentials insecurely, allowing a local authenticated attacker to extract plaintext credentials. These credentials can then be used to escalate privileges from the Manager role to the Systemadministrator role.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Local
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Changed
- Confidentiality
- Low
- Integrity
- Low
- Availability
- Low
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:L
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify SIMATIC RTLS Locating Manager versionCheck the installed version of SIMATIC RTLS Locating Manager via Windows Programs and Features, Siemens app listing, or check version info on the main executable (typically in C:\Program Files\Siemens\ or similar). Compare the version number to the fixed version V3.0.1.1.Affected if The installed version is prior to V3.0.1.1 or the version cannot be determined.
-
Verify Track Viewer Client component is presentLocate the Track Viewer Client installation directory (check for TrackViewerClient.exe or similar executable, typically under the SIMATIC RTLS installation path). Confirm the component is installed on the system.Affected if The Track Viewer Client component is installed.
-
Inspect credential storage locationSearch for configuration or data files that may contain stored credentials for the Track Viewer Client. Common locations include user profile directories, application data folders, or the installation directory. Look for files with extensions like .xml, .ini, .cfg, .dat, or .db that may contain user credentials.Affected if Credential files exist and contain stored authentication data (especially if readable in plaintext or weakly encrypted form).
-
Check for privilege escalation exposureExamine whether the stored credentials include Manager-level or Systemadministrator-level accounts. The vulnerability allows escalation from Manager role to Systemadministrator role, so verify if such role-based accounts are stored.Affected if Credentials for Manager or Systemadministrator roles are found in insecure storage.
If SIMATIC RTLS Locating Manager with Track Viewer Client is installed at a version prior to V3.0.1.1 and contains stored credentials for elevated roles, the environment is affected by this vulnerability.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scopedUpgrade SIMATIC RTLS Locating Manager to version V3.0.1.1 or later to resolve the improper credential protection.
V3.0.1.1
- Obtain the fixed version V3.0.1.1 of SIMATIC RTLS Locating Manager from the official Siemens cert-portal or Siemens industrial security website
- Back up the current SIMATIC RTLS Locating Manager configuration and data
- Install version V3.0.1.1 on the affected system(s) following the standard Siemens software installation procedure
- Verify the installation was successful and the application runs properly
- Confirm the credential protection has been addressed by verifying credentials are no longer stored in an unprotected manner
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation4.0 h
- Testing3.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,088.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2024-33497 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2024-33497 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data