Uncontrolled Search Path (DLL Hijack)Weakness · CWE-427

CVE-2024-33579

HIGH · 7.8 CVSS v3.1 Published 2024-10-11
Mitigation only
No fix yet — a mitigation exists. There is no fixed release. A documented workaround reduces exposure in the meantime.
See remediation →
80/100
Remediation priority · High
Zero-click

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
A DLL hijack vulnerability was reported in Lenovo Baiying that could allow a local attacker to execute code with elevated privileges.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · moderate confidence

A DLL hijacking vulnerability exists in Lenovo Baiying where the application loads dynamic link libraries from an insecure search path. A local attacker can place a malicious DLL in a location where the application will load it, achieving code execution with elevated privileges due to the application running with higher integrity levels.

MitigationImplement secure DLL loading by using fully qualified paths, removing unsafe DLL search paths, and leveraging the SetDllDirectory API to restrict DLL loading to trusted directories. Verify the vendor patch and apply it once available.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Local
Complexity
Low
Privileges
Low
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
High
Availability
High

CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Identify if Lenovo Baiying is installed
    Check common installation paths such as C:\Program Files\Lenovo\Baiying or C:\Program Files (x86)\Lenovo\Baiying. Also check the Windows Programs and Features list or registry under HKLM\SOFTWARE\Microsoft\Windows\CurrentVersion\Uninstall for an entry named 'Lenovo Baiying' or similar.
    Affected if Lenovo Baiying is found installed on the system
  2. Determine the installed version of Lenovo Baiying
    Locate the main executable (typically Baiying.exe or similar) in the installation directory. Right-click the executable, select Properties, and check the File Version field. Alternatively, query the registry key under HKLM\SOFTWARE\Lenovo\Baiying\Version or HKLM\SOFTWARE\WOW6432Node\Lenovo\Baiying\Version if present.
    Affected if The installed version is unknown or within any version range provided by Lenovo security advisories for CVE-2024-33579
  3. Verify if the application runs with elevated privileges
    Start Lenovo Baiying and check the process properties in Task Manager. Under the Details tab, check if the process integrity level is listed as 'High' or 'System' in the UAC column, or use Sysinternal's Process Explorer to view the process token and verify the integrity level.
    Affected if The Lenovo Baiying process runs with High or System integrity level, enabling privilege escalation potential
  4. Inspect DLL loading behavior
    Use Process Monitor (ProcMon) from Sysinternals to capture DLL load events when Lenovo Baiying starts. Set a filter for Path ending with .dll and Process Name containing Baiying. Check if any DLLs are loaded from directories writable by standard users, such as the application directory or current working directory.
    Affected if DLLs are being loaded from directories outside the secure Windows\System32 path, indicating insecure search path usage

If Lenovo Baiying is installed and runs with elevated (High or System) integrity level while loading DLLs from insecure paths, the environment is vulnerable to CVE-2024-33579 DLL hijacking.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

From vendor data
Mitigation available No clean upgrade yet — mitigate in the meantime
Mitigation

Implement secure DLL loading by using fully qualified paths, removing unsafe DLL search paths, and leveraging the SetDllDirectory API to restrict DLL loading to trusted directories. Verify the vendor patch and apply it once available.

Have this fixed Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation2.0 h
  • Implementation4.0 h
  • Testing3.0 h
  • Review / QA2.0 h
11.0 hours of engineering $1,930
Get help mitigating

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,088.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2024-33579 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2024-33579 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data