Missing AuthorizationWeakness · CWE-862

CVE-2024-33587

MEDIUM · 5.3 CVSS v3.1 Published 2024-04-29
Mitigation only
No fix yet — a mitigation exists. There is no fixed release. A documented workaround reduces exposure in the meantime.
See remediation →
62/100
Remediation priority · Elevated
Remotely reachable No privileges Zero-click

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
Missing Authorization vulnerability in Copy Content Protection Team Secure Copy Content Protection and Content Locking.This issue affects Secure Copy Content Protection and Content Locking: from n/a through 3.9.0.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · moderate confidence

This is a missing authorization vulnerability in the Secure Copy Content Protection and Content Locking WordPress plugin. The plugin fails to properly verify user permissions before allowing access to certain functionality, potentially allowing unauthenticated or lower-privileged users to access features that should be restricted to administrators or authorized users.

MitigationUpdate the plugin to the latest version beyond 3.9.0 if a patched version is available. If no patch exists, disable the plugin or implement web server-level access controls to restrict access to sensitive functionality.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Privileges
None
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
None
Integrity
Low
Availability
None

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Verify plugin is installed
    Check the WordPress plugins directory for the 'secure-copy-content-protection' or 'sccp' folder, or view the installed plugins list in wp-admin under Plugins.
    Affected if The plugin 'Secure Copy Content Protection and Content Locking' is present in the installation.
  2. Check installed plugin version
    Open the main plugin file (usually secure-copy-content-protection.php) in wp-content/plugins/ and look for the Version header comment, or check in wp-admin under Plugins > Installed Plugins.
    Affected if The installed version is 3.9.0 or lower.
  3. Identify exposed admin functions
    Review the plugin source code for AJAX handlers (wp_ajax_*) and REST API routes that lack capability checks. Search for 'add_action' calls to wp_ajax or wp_ajax_nopriv and verify if current_user_can() or similar authorization checks are present before executing sensitive operations.
    Affected if AJAX or API endpoints exist that process requests without verifying user capabilities.
  4. Test unauthorized access to protected features
    Attempt to access plugin admin pages or trigger plugin functions while logged out or as a low-privilege user (subscriber). Check if actions like unlocking content, exporting data, or modifying settings succeed without proper authorization.
    Affected if Actions complete successfully without authentication or without sufficient user privileges.

The environment is affected if the Secure Copy Content Protection plugin is installed with version 3.9.0 or lower and authorization checks are missing or insufficient on its functionality endpoints.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

From vendor data
Mitigation available No clean upgrade yet — mitigate in the meantime
Mitigation

Update the plugin to the latest version beyond 3.9.0 if a patched version is available. If no patch exists, disable the plugin or implement web server-level access controls to restrict access to sensitive functionality.

Have this fixed Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation2.0 h
  • Implementation4.0 h
  • Testing3.0 h
  • Review / QA1.0 h
10.0 hours of engineering $1,750
Get help mitigating

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $2,800.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2024-33587 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2024-33587 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data