Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF)Weakness · CWE-918

CVE-2024-33592

MEDIUM · 5.4 CVSS v3.1 Published 2024-04-25
Mitigation only
No fix yet — a mitigation exists. There is no fixed release. A documented workaround reduces exposure in the meantime.
See remediation →
63/100
Remediation priority · Elevated
Remotely reachable No privileges Zero-click

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in SoftLab Radio Player.This issue affects Radio Player: from n/a through 2.0.73.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · moderate confidence

Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in SoftLab Radio Player allows remote attackers to induce the server to make arbitrary requests to internal or external resources. The vulnerability exists in the URL handling functionality of the radio player application.

MitigationImplement strict URL validation with allowlist controls, restrict allowed protocols and destinations, and validate all user-supplied URLs before server-side requests.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
High
Privileges
None
User interaction
None
Scope
Changed
Confidentiality
Low
Integrity
Low
Availability
None

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Identify SoftLab Radio Player installation
    Check for SoftLab Radio Player application files in the web server directory, common paths include /var/www/, /htdocs/, or the application-specific installation directory. Look for files named 'radio.php', 'player.php', or a 'softlab' directory.
    Affected if SoftLab Radio Player is present on the system
  2. Determine the installed version
    Check version files such as version.php, CHANGELOG, or a config/version file within the SoftLab Radio Player installation directory. Compare the version string against any officially documented version ranges.
    Affected if The installed version has no patch applied or is older than the fixed version (check vendor documentation for specific version numbers)
  3. Verify URL handling functionality is exposed
    Examine the web application's routing or endpoint configuration to determine if the radio station URL submission or playlist fetching feature is accessible via HTTP/HTTPS. Look for endpoints that accept URLs as input parameters.
    Affected if The URL handling feature is accessible over the network without authentication or with weak access controls
  4. Inspect URL validation logic
    Review the source code files that handle URL processing, typically in the main player script or a 'request', 'fetch', or 'stream' module. Look for absence of strict allowlist validation on the URL parameter before making server-side requests.
    Affected if No strict URL allowlist or protocol validation is implemented in the code handling URL requests
  5. Test for SSRF behavior
    If authorized, submit a test URL pointing to an internal resource (such as http://127.0.0.1 or an internal IP) via the radio player URL input field and observe if the server attempts to fetch it.
    Affected if The server makes requests to arbitrary URLs provided in the input, including internal resources

A user is affected if SoftLab Radio Player is installed with an unpatched version and the URL handling feature is network-accessible without strict validation controls.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

dbcve · scoped
Mitigation available No clean upgrade yet — mitigate in the meantime
Mitigation

Implement strict URL validation with allowlist controls, restrict allowed protocols and destinations, and validate all user-supplied URLs before server-side requests.

Recommended fix Moderate confidence

Any version above 2.0.73 (latest stable release)

  1. 1. Navigate to the SoftLab Radio Player plugin/theme in your WordPress installation
  2. 2. Check the current installed version of Radio Player
  3. 3. Check SoftLab's official WordPress repository or their website for the latest version
  4. 4. Update Radio Player to the latest available version (any version above 2.0.73)
  5. 5. Verify the update was successful and test that SSRF protections are functioning
Caveat Review the changelog for any breaking changes between your current version and the new version before updating

Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.

Have this fixed Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation3.0 h
  • Implementation6.0 h
  • Testing4.0 h
  • Review / QA3.0 h
16.0 hours of engineering $2,820
Get help mitigating

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $4,512.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2024-33592 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2024-33592 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data