CVE-2024-33604
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedA reflected cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability exist in undisclosed page of the BIG-IP Configuration utility that allows an attacker to run JavaScript in the context of the currently logged-in user. Note: Software versions which have reached End of Technical Support (EoTS) are not evaluated
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceReflected cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability in an undisclosed page of F5 BIG-IP Configuration utility. Attackers can inject malicious JavaScript via crafted URLs that executes in the context of the victim's active session, potentially allowing session hijacking or actions as the logged-in user.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data>= 15.1.0, < 15.1.10.4>= 16.1.0, < 16.1.4.3>= 17.1.0, < 17.1.1.3>= 15.1.0, < 15.1.10.4>= 16.1.0, < 16.1.4.3>= 17.1.0, < 17.1.1.3>= 15.1.0, < 15.1.10.4>= 16.1.0, < 16.1.4.3>= 17.1.0, < 17.1.1.3>= 15.1.0, < 15.1.10.4>= 16.1.0, < 16.1.4.3>= 17.1.0, < 17.1.1.3>= 15.1.0, < 15.1.10.4>= 16.1.0, < 16.1.4.3>= 17.1.0, < 17.1.1.3>= 15.1.0, < 15.1.10.4>= 16.1.0, < 16.1.4.3>= 17.1.0, < 17.1.1.3>= 15.1.0, < 15.1.10.4>= 16.1.0, < 16.1.4.3>= 17.1.0, < 17.1.1.3>= 15.1.0, < 15.1.10.4>= 16.1.0, < 16.1.4.3>= 17.1.0, < 17.1.1.3CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- Required
- Scope
- Changed
- Confidentiality
- Low
- Integrity
- Low
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify BIG-IP base versionRun command: tmsh show sys version | grep -i version or access System > Software Management > ISO Image in the GUIAffected if Version falls within 15.1.0-15.1.10.3, 16.1.0-16.1.4.2, or 17.1.0-17.1.1.2
-
Confirm affected module versionsCheck each installed module version via tmsh: tmsh list sys software volume <volume-name> | grep -i version, or view in GUI under System > Software ManagementAffected if Any BIG-IP module (APM, AFM, ASM, Analytics, AAM, ASM, AVR, Automation Toolchain) matches the affected version ranges
-
Verify Configuration utility exposureReview network access restrictions: tmsh list sys httpd all-procs or check iRule/Policy restrictions for management interface accessAffected if The Configuration utility (management GUI) is accessible from untrusted networks without proper access controls
-
Examine access logs for suspicious URLsReview /var/log/httpd/tmui.log for unusual query parameters, especially on the undisclosed affected page. Use: grep -E '\?.*=' /var/log/httpd/tmui.log | head -100Affected if Logs show crafted URLs with script injection patterns (such as <script> tags, javascript: URLs, or event handlers in query parameters)
If the BIG-IP version falls within 15.1.0-15.1.10.3, 16.1.0-16.1.4.2, or 17.1.0-17.1.1.2 AND the Configuration utility is accessible to potential attackers, the environment is vulnerable to reflected XSS via crafted URLs.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped15.1.10.416.1.4.317.1.1.3
Apply the F5 security update for CVE-2024-33604 when available. Until then, implement URL filtering and monitor for suspicious links targeting BIG-IP interfaces, as this is a reflected XSS requiring user interaction.
Upgrade to 15.1.10.4+, 16.1.4.3+, or 17.1.1.3+ depending on your current major version branch
- 1. Identify the current BIG-IP version by checking System > Software Management > ISO Image or using 'tmsh show sys version'
- 2. Determine which version branch (15.1.x, 16.1.x, or 17.1.x) is currently deployed
- 3. Download the appropriate fixed version ISO from F5 Networks: 15.1.10.4 (or later 15.1.x), 16.1.4.3 (or later 16.1.x), or 17.1.1.3 (or later 17.1.x)
- 4. Upload the new software image to the BIG-IP device via System > Software Management > ISO Image
- 5. Create a new volume for the upgrade via System > Software Management > Volume
- 6. Install the new software version to the volume
- 7. Reboot the BIG-IP device to boot from the new volume
- 8. Verify the upgrade was successful by checking System > Software Management > Volume status and confirming the version number
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation8.0 h
- Testing6.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $5,600.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2024-33604 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2024-33604 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data