Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF)Weakness · CWE-352

CVE-2024-33632

MEDIUM · 5.4 CVSS v3.1 Published 2024-04-29
Mitigation only
No fix yet — a mitigation exists. There is no fixed release. A documented workaround reduces exposure in the meantime.
See remediation →
61/100
Remediation priority · Elevated
Remotely reachable No privileges

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Piotnet Piotnet Addons For Elementor Pro.This issue affects Piotnet Addons For Elementor Pro: from n/a through 7.1.17.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · moderate confidence

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Piotnet Addons For Elementor Pro allows attackers to trick authenticated users into submitting unintended requests to the application. The CVSS 5.4 indicates Network adjacency, Low attack complexity, Low privileges required, User interaction required, and Unchanged scope, suggesting the attack exploits existing user sessions.

MitigationImplement anti-CSRF tokens (synchronizer token pattern) on all state-changing operations and validate token presence server-side; additionally enforce SameSite cookie attributes and validate Origin/Referer headers as defense-in-depth.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Privileges
None
User interaction
Required
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
None
Integrity
Low
Availability
Low

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:L

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Confirm Piotnet Addons For Elementor Pro is installed
    Navigate to WordPress admin > Plugins and locate Piotnet Addons For Elementor Pro in the list of installed plugins
    Affected if The plugin is installed and active - this is a prerequisite for being affected
  2. Identify the installed version number
    In the WordPress plugins list, click on the plugin to view details, or check the plugin header in /wp-content/plugins/piotnet-addons-for-elementor-pro/ directory for the Version field
    Affected if Version cannot be determined or is unknown - you must verify the exact version to compare against affected ranges
  3. Compare your version against known affected versions
    Review the version identified in step 2 against any official security advisories listing affected versions of Piotnet Addons For Elementor Pro
    Affected if Your installed version falls within a version range publicly disclosed as vulnerable to CVE-2024-33632
  4. Verify if state-changing forms lack anti-CSRF protection
    Inspect forms generated by the plugin (such as submission forms, settings updates, or user actions) using browser developer tools; check if each form includes a nonce token field (typically named _wpnonce, nonce, or similar)
    Affected if Forms performing state-changing operations (like saving settings, submitting data, or modifying content) are missing nonce or token validation fields
  5. Check SameSite cookie attributes on session cookies
    In browser developer tools > Application > Cookies, examine cookies set by the site; verify if session or authentication cookies have the SameSite attribute set to Strict or Lax
    Affected if Cookies related to user authentication lack SameSite attribute or have it set to None without Secure flag - this indicates missing defense-in-depth for CSRF

You are affected if Piotnet Addons For Elementor Pro is installed, your specific version matches a vulnerable release, and the plugin's state-changing operations lack anti-CSRF token validation.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

dbcve · scoped
Mitigation available No clean upgrade yet — mitigate in the meantime
Mitigation

Implement anti-CSRF tokens (synchronizer token pattern) on all state-changing operations and validate token presence server-side; additionally enforce SameSite cookie attributes and validate Origin/Referer headers as defense-in-depth.

Recommended fix Moderate confidence

Version 7.1.18 or later

  1. 1. Backup your WordPress site and database before making any changes.
  2. 2. Navigate to your WordPress dashboard and go to Plugins > Installed Plugins.
  3. 3. Find Piotnet Addons For Elementor Pro in the plugin list.
  4. 4. If an update is available, click 'Update Now' to upgrade to the latest version (7.1.18 or later).
  5. 5. Alternatively, download the updated plugin version from the official Piotnet website or your purchase source.
  6. 6. Deactivate the current plugin version, delete it, then install the new version (7.1.18 or later).
  7. 7. After upgrade, clear any caching and test that Elementor editor functionality works correctly.
Caveat Minor plugin updates typically have no breaking changes, but test critical forms and element functionality after upgrade

Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.

Have this fixed Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation3.0 h
  • Implementation6.0 h
  • Testing3.0 h
  • Review / QA2.0 h
14.0 hours of engineering $2,490
Get help mitigating

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,984.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2024-33632 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2024-33632 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data