dbcve.org
Incorrect Permission AssignmentWeakness · CWE-732

CVE-2024-3375

CRITICAL · 9.4 CVSS v3.1 Published 2024-04-29
Mitigation only
No fix yet — a mitigation exists. There is no fixed release. A documented workaround reduces exposure in the meantime.
See remediation →
100/100
Remediation priority · Urgent
Remotely reachable No privileges Zero-click

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
Incorrect Permission Assignment for Critical Resource vulnerability in Havelsan Inc. Dialogue allows Accessing Functionality Not Properly Constrained by ACLs. This issue affects Dialogue: from v1.83 before v1.83.1 or v1.84.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · moderate confidence

A critical incorrect permission assignment vulnerability in Havelsan Dialogue allows unauthorized access to functionality not properly constrained by ACLs, enabling attackers to access critical resources without proper authorization due to missing or misconfigured access control lists.

MitigationUpgrade Dialogue to v1.83.1 or v1.84 to obtain the patched version, and conduct a post-patch review of ACL configurations to verify the access controls are properly enforced.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Privileges
None
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
Low
Availability
High

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:L/A:H

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Identify if Havelsan Dialogue is installed
    Check for Dialogue installation directories, services, or running processes on the system. Common locations may include program files or application servers.
    Affected if Havelsan Dialogue software is present on the system
  2. Determine the installed Dialogue version
    Locate the version information file, use the product's built-in About/Version dialog, or query the running service for its version number.
    Affected if The installed version is lower than v1.83.1 or v1.84 (the patched versions)
  3. Locate and inspect ACL configuration files
    Search for access control list configuration files within the Dialogue installation directory, typically found in config, conf, or settings subdirectories.
    Affected if ACL configuration files are missing, absent, or contain overly permissive rules granting unauthorized access
  4. Verify access control enforcement on critical resources
    Examine the ACL definitions for critical resources, functions, or modules to confirm they properly restrict access based on user roles or permissions.
    Affected if Critical resources lack proper ACL constraints or allow access without proper authorization checks
  5. Review user role and permission mappings
    Inspect how user roles are mapped to permissions within the Dialogue system, checking if roles are correctly assigned to constrained access control lists.
    Affected if Role-to-permission mappings are misconfigured or permit unauthorized role assignments to sensitive functions

The environment is affected if Havelsan Dialogue is installed with a version below v1.83.1 or v1.84 and has missing or misconfigured access control lists that allow unauthorized access to critical resources.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

dbcve · scoped
Mitigation available No clean upgrade yet — mitigate in the meantime
Mitigation

Upgrade Dialogue to v1.83.1 or v1.84 to obtain the patched version, and conduct a post-patch review of ACL configurations to verify the access controls are properly enforced.

Recommended fix Moderate confidence

v1.83.1 or v1.84 (either version fixes the vulnerability)

  1. 1. Identify the current installed version of Havelsan Dialogue.
  2. 2. If running v1.83 or any version before v1.83.1 or v1.84, plan for upgrade.
  3. 3. Obtain the fixed version (v1.83.1 or v1.84) from the official vendor (Havelsan Inc.).
  4. 4. Review release notes for v1.83.1 or v1.84 to understand changes and any specific upgrade requirements.
  5. 5. Create a backup of the current system configuration and data.
  6. 6. Test the upgrade in a non-production environment first.
  7. 7. Apply the upgrade following vendor-provided installation instructions.
  8. 8. Verify that the upgrade was successful and the vulnerability is remediated.
Caveat No specific breaking changes mentioned in available sources; standard testing recommended after upgrade

Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.

Have this fixed Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation2.0 h
  • Implementation1.0 h
  • Testing3.0 h
  • Review / QA2.0 h
8.0 hours of engineering $1,390
Get help mitigating

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $2,224.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2024-3375 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

Get it on GitHub Scan in the browser

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2024-3375 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data