CVE-2024-3383
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedA vulnerability in how Palo Alto Networks PAN-OS software processes data received from Cloud Identity Engine (CIE) agents enables modification of User-ID groups. This impacts user access to network resources where users may be inappropriately denied or allowed access to resources based on your existing Security Policy rules.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceA vulnerability in PAN-OS allows modification of User-ID groups through malicious data processed from Cloud Identity Engine (CIE) agents. This enables attackers to manipulate group mappings and bypass Security Policy rules, resulting in inappropriate denial or allowance of network resource access.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data>= 10.1.0, < 10.1.11>= 10.2.0, < 10.2.5>= 11.0.0, < 11.0.3CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- None
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Check PAN-OS versionAccess the firewall CLI and run 'show system info' or check via the web interface under Device > Setup > Operations > Device Information. Look for the 'PanOS' version field.Affected if The installed version is 10.1.0-10.1.10, 10.2.0-10.2.4, or 11.0.0-11.0.2 (i.e., it falls within the affected ranges but is before the fixed versions).
-
Verify User-ID is enabledIn the PAN-OS web interface, go to Device > User Identification > User-ID Settings, or run 'show user-id-bleeping' in CLI. Check if User-ID is enabled.Affected if User-ID is enabled and the PAN-OS version is in the affected range.
-
Confirm Cloud Identity Engine (CIE) integrationCheck if CIE agents are configured: in the web interface, go to Device > Cloud Identity Engine > Agents, or run 'show cloud-identity-engine agents' in CLI. Also check Device > User Identification > Cloud Identity Engine Service settings.Affected if CIE agents are connected and syncing identity data to the firewall.
-
Review User-ID group mappings for anomaliesIn the web interface, go to Device > User Identification > User-ID Groups. Alternatively, run 'show user group list' and compare current group mappings against known-good baselines. Look for unexpected group assignments, duplicate entries, or groups with incorrect member lists.Affected if Group mappings show unauthorized or unexpected modifications that do not align with your directory configuration.
You are affected if your PAN-OS version falls within the affected ranges (10.1.x before 10.1.11, 10.2.x before 10.2.5, or 11.0.x before 11.0.3), User-ID is enabled with CIE integration, and User-ID group mappings contain unexpected or unauthorized changes.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped10.1.1110.2.511.0.3
Apply the vendor-supplied PAN-OS patch addressing this vulnerability and verify User-ID group mappings remain correct post-update.
Upgrade to PAN-OS 10.1.11 (for 10.1.x branch), 10.2.5 (for 10.2.x branch), or 11.0.3 (for 11.0.x branch)
- 1. Identify the current PAN-OS version by navigating to Device > Support or using 'show system info' in the CLI
- 2. Determine which version branch you are running (10.1.x, 10.2.x, or 11.0.x)
- 3. Download the appropriate fixed release from the Palo Alto Networks Support Portal: 10.1.11 for 10.1.x branch, 10.2.5 for 10.2.x branch, or 11.0.3 for 11.0.x branch
- 4. Upload the update to the PAN-OS device via Device > Software > Upload, or via CLI using 'request system software upload'
- 5. Install the update via Device > Software > Install, or via CLI using 'request system software install <filename>'
- 6. After installation, reboot the device to complete the update
- 7. Verify the new version is installed and the vulnerability is resolved by checking Device > Support or running 'show system info'
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation8.0 h
- Testing8.0 h
- Review / QA4.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $6,656.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2024-3383 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2024-3383 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data