Hdf5Application · Hdfgroup

CVE-2024-33876

MEDIUM · 5.7 CVSS v3.1 Published 2024-05-14
Fix available
A fix is available. Upgrade to 1.14.4 or later.
See remediation →
62/100
Remediation priority · Elevated
No privileges Zero-click

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
HDF5 Library through 1.14.3 has a heap buffer overflow in H5S__point_deserialize in H5Spoint.c.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · high confidence

Heap buffer overflow vulnerability in H5S__point_deserialize function in H5Spoint.c of HDF5 Library through version 1.14.3. The flaw allows specially crafted HDF5 files to trigger overflow during point deserialization, potentially leading to denial of service or arbitrary code execution.

MitigationUpgrade HDF5 Library to a version beyond 1.14.3 when available, or apply vendor-supplied patches. Prioritize remediation in environments processing untrusted HDF5 file input.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.

NVD · CPE data
Hdf5Application
Affected:< 1.14.4

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Local
Complexity
High
Privileges
None
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
None
Integrity
Low
Availability
High

CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:H

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Identify installed HDF5 library version
    Run 'h5dump --version' or check package manager (dpkg -l | grep hdf5, rpm -qa | grep hdf5) or inspect libhdf5.so version string
    Affected if Version is 1.14.3 or earlier (any version < 1.14.4)
  2. Locate HDF5 library files
    Search for libhdf5.so or libhdf5.a in system paths: /usr/lib, /usr/local/lib, or custom install directories using 'find / -name "libhdf5*" 2>/dev/null'
    Affected if Any installed HDF5 library version is below 1.14.4
  3. Identify applications using HDF5
    Run 'ldd /path/to/binary | grep hdf5' on suspected applications, or use 'grep -r HDF5 /proc/$(pgrep -f processname)/maps' for running processes
    Affected if Any application dynamically links to a vulnerable HDF5 library version
  4. Detect point deserialization operations
    Monitor for HDF5 file access patterns involving point selections (H5Ssel_points API calls), or audit application logs for HDF5 operations on datasets with point selections
    Affected if Application reads HDF5 files containing point selection datasets using vulnerable library

User is affected if HDF5 library version is below 1.14.4 AND the system processes HDF5 files, especially untrusted ones.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

dbcve · scoped
Upgrade available Upgrade to 1.14.4 or later
Fixed in 1.14.4
Interim mitigation

Upgrade HDF5 Library to a version beyond 1.14.3 when available, or apply vendor-supplied patches. Prioritize remediation in environments processing untrusted HDF5 file input.

Recommended fix High confidence

1.14.4

  1. Identify all systems and applications using HDF5 library version < 1.14.4
  2. Consult your system's package manager or build system to check the currently installed HDF5 version
  3. Upgrade HDF5 to version 1.14.4 or later from the official HDF Group (www.hdfgroup.org)
  4. After upgrading the library, rebuild and recompile any applications that link against HDF5 to ensure they use the updated library
  5. Verify the upgrade was successful by checking the HDF5 version number

Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.

Fix this in Hdf5 Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation6.0 h
  • Implementation4.0 h
  • Testing8.0 h
  • Review / QA4.0 h
22.0 hours of engineering $3,840
Get the upgrade done

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $6,144.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2024-33876 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2024-33876 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data