CVE-2024-3388
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedA vulnerability in the GlobalProtect Gateway in Palo Alto Networks PAN-OS software enables an authenticated attacker to impersonate another user and send network packets to internal assets. However, this vulnerability does not allow the attacker to receive response packets from those internal assets.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceA vulnerability in the GlobalProtect Gateway VPN component of Palo Alto Networks PAN-OS allows an authenticated attacker to impersonate other users and send network packets to internal assets. The attacker cannot receive response packets, limiting the impact to one-way packet injection rather than full bidirectional communication.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data>= 8.1.0, < 8.1.26>= 9.0.0, < 9.0.17>= 9.1.0, < 9.1.17>= 10.1.0, < 10.1.11>= 10.2.0, < 10.2.7>= 11.0.0, < 11.0.3= 9.0.17= 10.1.11= 10.2.7all versionsCVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Changed
- Confidentiality
- None
- Integrity
- Low
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:N/I:L/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Check PAN-OS versionRun 'show system info' or access the device dashboard to view the PAN-OS version installedAffected if The version falls within 8.1.0 to 8.1.26, 9.0.0 to 9.0.17, 9.1.0 to 9.1.17, 10.1.0 to 10.1.11, 10.2.0 to 10.2.7, or 11.0.0 to 11.0.3, or matches exactly 9.0.17, 10.1.11, or 10.2.7
-
Identify if using Prisma AccessConfirm whether the environment is Palo Alto Networks Prisma Access rather than on-premises PAN-OSAffected if The environment is Prisma Access (all versions are affected)
-
Verify GlobalProtect Gateway is enabledCheck the GlobalProtect configuration: go to Network > GlobalProtect > Gateways and confirm if any Gateway is configured and enabledAffected if GlobalProtect Gateway is active and accepts VPN connections, allowing the authenticated attacker to send packets
-
Confirm authentication method for GlobalProtectReview GlobalProtect authentication settings under Network > GlobalProtect > Gateways to see what user authentication is in useAffected if User authentication is configured, as the attacker needs valid authentication to exploit this flaw
You are affected if your PAN-OS version is within the vulnerable ranges or you use Prisma Access, AND GlobalProtect Gateway is enabled and configured with user authentication.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped8.1.269.0.179.1.17
Apply the relevant PAN-OS update from Palo Alto Networks for this vulnerability. Additionally, review GlobalProtect authentication configurations and implement network segmentation to limit lateral movement from compromised VPN sessions.
PAN-OS 8.1.26 / 9.0.17 / 9.1.17 / 10.1.11 or later (select based on your current version branch); contact Palo Alto Networks for Prisma Access fixes
- Identify the current PAN-OS version by navigating to Dashboard > General Info in the web interface or running 'show system info' in CLI
- Determine which version branch you are currently on (8.1.x, 9.0.x, 9.1.x, or 10.1.x)
- Download the appropriate fixed version from the Palo Alto Networks support portal: for 8.1.x upgrade to 8.1.26+, for 9.0.x upgrade to 9.0.17+, for 9.1.x upgrade to 9.1.17+, for 10.1.x upgrade to 10.1.11+
- Upload the upgrade image via Device > Software > Upload in the web interface
- Schedule a maintenance window as upgrades require a reboot
- Install the upgrade and confirm successful completion
- For Prisma Access customers, contact Palo Alto Networks support for patch availability as no specific version is listed
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation6.0 h
- Testing8.0 h
- Review / QA4.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $6,080.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2024-3388 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2024-3388 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data