CVE-2024-3393
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedA Denial of Service vulnerability in the DNS Security feature of Palo Alto Networks PAN-OS software allows an unauthenticated attacker to send a malicious packet through the data plane of the firewall that reboots the firewall. Repeated attempts to trigger this condition will cause the firewall to enter maintenance mode.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceA Denial of Service vulnerability exists in the DNS Security feature of Palo Alto Networks PAN-OS software. An unauthenticated attacker can send a malicious packet through the firewall's data plane causing an immediate reboot. Repeated exploitation will cause the firewall to enter maintenance mode.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data>= 11.1.0, <= 11.1.1>= 11.2.0, < 11.2.3= 10.1.14= 10.2.8= 10.2.9= 10.2.10= 10.2.11= 10.2.12= 10.2.13= 11.1.2= 11.1.3= 11.1.4all versionsCVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- None
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify the PAN-OS versionRun 'show system info' on the firewall CLI or check via Panorama under Device > Setup > Operations > Device InformationAffected if The version matches any of these ranges: 11.1.0 to 11.1.1, 11.2.0 to 11.2.2, 10.1.14, 10.2.8 to 10.2.13, 11.1.2 to 11.1.4, or any Prisma Access version
-
Confirm DNS Security is enabledNavigate to Objects > DNS Security in the web UI or run 'show dns-security' in the CLI to check if the DNS Security service is activeAffected if DNS Security feature is turned on or any DNS Security policies are configured
-
Check for DNS Security policy rulesReview Policies > DNS Security in the web UI or run 'show dns-security policy' to list any active DNS Security policiesAffected if Any DNS Security policies exist that process DNS traffic through the firewall
-
Verify external exposureReview the firewall interface configuration and security zone assignments to determine if interfaces facing untrusted networks (such as internet-facing interfaces) are permitted to process DNS trafficAffected if The firewall has interfaces with exposed DNS Security processing to untrusted or external networks
You are affected if your PAN-OS version is in the affected list (or any Prisma Access version) AND DNS Security is enabled or configured on the firewall.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped11.2.3
Apply the vendor-supplied PAN-OS security update when available. As a temporary workaround, consider disabling the DNS Security feature if operationally feasible, or implement network-level filtering to limit exposure to untrusted traffic sources.
PAN-OS 11.2.3 or later (for 11.2.x line); PAN-OS 11.1.2 or later (for 11.1.x line); PAN-OS 10.2.9 or later (for 10.2.x line); PAN-OS 10.1.15 or later (for 10.1.x line); latest Prisma Access version
- 1. Identify the current PAN-OS or Prisma Access version running on the device
- 2. For PAN-OS 11.1.x: Upgrade to PAN-OS 11.1.2 or later
- 3. For PAN-OS 11.2.x: Upgrade to PAN-OS 11.2.3 or later
- 4. For PAN-OS 10.1.x: Upgrade to a version newer than 10.1.14 (e.g., 10.1.15 or later)
- 5. For PAN-OS 10.2.x: Upgrade to a version newer than 10.2.8 (e.g., 10.2.9 or later)
- 6. For Prisma Access: Apply the latest Prisma Access version per Palo Alto Networks guidance
- 7. After upgrade, verify the DNS Security feature is functioning correctly
- 8. Monitor for any unexpected firewall behavior
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation3.0 h
- Testing4.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,680.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2024-3393 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2024-3393 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data