Improper Privilege ManagementWeakness · CWE-269

CVE-2024-34331

CRITICAL · 9.8 CVSS v3.1 Published 2024-09-23
Mitigation only
No fix yet — a mitigation exists. There is no fixed release. A documented workaround reduces exposure in the meantime.
See remediation →
100/100
Remediation priority · Urgent
Remotely reachable No privileges Zero-click

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
A lack of code signature verification in Parallels Desktop for Mac v19.3.0 and below allows attackers to escalate privileges via a crafted macOS installer, because Parallels Service is setuid root.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · high confidence

This is a privilege escalation vulnerability in Parallels Desktop for Mac where lack of code signature verification in the installer mechanism allows attackers to install and execute malicious code with root privileges. The Parallels Service runs as setuid root, enabling a crafted malicious installer to bypass authentication and escalate to full system privileges.

MitigationUpdate Parallels Desktop to version 19.3.1 or later which includes code signature verification. Alternatively, remove or disable Parallels Desktop if not required.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Privileges
None
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
High
Availability
High

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Check if Parallels Desktop is installed
    Look for Parallels Desktop in /Applications/ or check via Spotlight. Also verify if the Parallels Service binary exists at a path like /Applications/Parallels Desktop/Parallels Service.app or similar locations.
    Affected if Parallels Desktop is not found in the system - the user is not affected.
  2. Determine the installed Parallels Desktop version
    Run '/Applications/Parallels Desktop.app/Contents/MacOS/prl_client_app --version' or right-click the Parallels Desktop app in /Applications and select Get Info to view the version. Alternatively, run 'prlctl --version' if the command-line tools are installed.
    Affected if The installed version is 19.3.0 or lower - the version falls within the affected range.
  3. Verify the Parallels Service binary has setuid root permissions
    Locate the Parallels Service binary (typically in /Applications/Parallels Desktop/Contents/MacOS/ or within the Parallels Service.app bundle) and run 'ls -la <path-to-binary>' to inspect permissions. Look for 's' in the owner execute field (e.g., '-rwsr-xr-x').
    Affected if The Parallels Service binary has the setuid bit set (owner permissions show 's' instead of 'x') - the privilege escalation vector is present.
  4. Confirm code signature verification status (if detectable)
    Run 'codesign -dv --verbose=4 /Applications/Parallels Desktop/Contents/MacOS/prl_client_app' or similar binaries to check code signature details. Review the output for 'Signature=...' and 'Info.plist=...' entries. Note: The vulnerability exists precisely because this verification was missing in affected versions.
    Affected if Code signature verification is absent or invalid on the Parallels binaries - the vulnerability condition is confirmed.

The user is affected if Parallels Desktop version 19.3.0 or lower is installed AND the Parallels Service binary has setuid root permissions, indicating the lack of code signature verification vulnerability is present.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

From vendor data
Mitigation available No clean upgrade yet — mitigate in the meantime
Mitigation

Update Parallels Desktop to version 19.3.1 or later which includes code signature verification. Alternatively, remove or disable Parallels Desktop if not required.

Have this fixed Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation1.0 h
  • Implementation1.0 h
  • Testing1.0 h
  • Review / QA0.5 h
3.5 hours of engineering $750
Get help mitigating

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $1,200.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2024-34331 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2024-34331 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data