Missing AuthorizationWeakness · CWE-862

CVE-2024-34442

MEDIUM · 5.3 CVSS v3.1 Published 2024-06-11
Mitigation only
No fix yet — a mitigation exists. There is no fixed release. A documented workaround reduces exposure in the meantime.
See remediation →
62/100
Remediation priority · Elevated
Remotely reachable No privileges Zero-click

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
Missing Authorization vulnerability in weDevs weDocs.This issue affects weDocs: from n/a through 2.1.4.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · moderate confidence

Missing Authorization vulnerability in weDevs weDocs plugin allows unauthorized users to access or modify documentation content without proper authentication/authorization checks. The issue affects version 2.1.4 and likely allows privilege escalation or unauthorized data access due to missing access control validation in certain plugin functions.

MitigationUpdate to the latest version of weDocs (2.1.5 or later) which includes proper authorization checks. If immediate update is not possible, restrict access to affected endpoints via server-side configuration or temporarily disable the plugin until patched.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Privileges
None
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
None
Integrity
Low
Availability
None

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Confirm weDocs plugin installation and version
    In WordPress admin, go to Plugins > Installed Plugins and locate weDocs. Check the version number displayed. Alternatively, inspect the main plugin file (typically /wp-content/plugins/wedocs/includes/class-wedocs.php or similar) and look for the 'Version' header comment.
    Affected if The installed version is 2.1.4 or any version prior to 2.1.5, indicating the missing authorization vulnerability is present.
  2. Identify active documentation endpoints
    Review the plugin directory for PHP files handling public-facing documentation routes (commonly in /includes/ or /api/ subfolders). Look for functions processing user requests without checking user capabilities or permissions.
    Affected if Publicly accessible endpoints exist that handle documentation content without verifying user authorization before allowing access or modification.
  3. Verify authorization logic in plugin functions
    Search plugin source code for AJAX actions or REST API endpoints related to document creation, editing, or deletion. Examine whether functions call current_user_can() or wp_verify_nonce() before executing sensitive operations.
    Affected if Code analysis reveals that sensitive functions (create, edit, delete, or view restricted docs) lack proper capability checks or nonce verification.
  4. Check for exposed admin functions
    Inspect admin-ajax.php hooks and REST API routes registered by the plugin. Look for any registered actions with 'nopriv' capability (allowing unauthenticated users) that handle documentation content.
    Affected if Any documentation-related AJAX or REST endpoints are registered with 'nopriv' or low-privilege capability checks, allowing unauthenticated access.

A user is affected if weDocs version 2.1.4 or earlier is installed and active, with publicly accessible endpoints or functions that handle documentation content without verifying user permissions.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

From vendor data
Mitigation available No clean upgrade yet — mitigate in the meantime
Mitigation

Update to the latest version of weDocs (2.1.5 or later) which includes proper authorization checks. If immediate update is not possible, restrict access to affected endpoints via server-side configuration or temporarily disable the plugin until patched.

Have this fixed Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation2.0 h
  • Implementation3.0 h
  • Testing2.0 h
  • Review / QA1.0 h
8.0 hours of engineering $1,420
Get help mitigating

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $2,272.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2024-34442 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2024-34442 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data