dbcve.org
Sensitive Information in LogsWeakness · CWE-532

CVE-2024-34527

HIGH · 7.5 CVSS v3.1 Published 2024-05-06
Mitigation only
No fix yet — a mitigation exists. There is no fixed release. A documented workaround reduces exposure in the meantime.
See remediation →
84/100
Remediation priority · High
Remotely reachable No privileges Zero-click

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
spaces_plugin/app.py in SolidUI 0.4.0 has an unnecessary print statement for an OpenAI key. The printed string might be logged.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · high confidence

The spaces_plugin/app.py file in SolidUI 0.4.0 contains an unnecessary print statement that outputs an OpenAI API key. Since print output may be captured by logging systems or terminal history, this exposes the API key to potential credential theft.

MitigationRemove the print statement containing the OpenAI key from spaces_plugin/app.py and rotate any API keys that may have been exposed.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Privileges
None
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
None
Availability
None

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Check SolidUI version
    Run 'pip show solidui' or check package metadata to determine if version 0.4.0 is installed
    Affected if Version is 0.4.0 exactly
  2. Locate spaces_plugin/app.py
    Find the spaces_plugin/app.py file in the SolidUI installation directory (typically in site-packages or the source directory)
    Affected if The file exists in the installed package
  3. Inspect for API key print statement
    Open spaces_plugin/app.py and search for print statements that contain patterns resembling API keys (strings starting with 'sk-' or similar OpenAI key prefixes)
    Affected if A print statement outputting an API key is present in the code
  4. Check for credential exposure
    Review any captured logs, terminal history files, or system logs that may have recorded output from running the application
    Affected if Logs or history files contain the printed API key

A user is affected if SolidUI version 0.4.0 is installed and the spaces_plugin/app.py file contains a print statement that outputs an OpenAI API key, meaning credentials may have been exposed through logging or terminal history.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

From vendor data
Mitigation available No clean upgrade yet — mitigate in the meantime
Mitigation

Remove the print statement containing the OpenAI key from spaces_plugin/app.py and rotate any API keys that may have been exposed.

Have this fixed Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation1.0 h
  • Implementation1.0 h
  • Testing1.0 h
  • Review / QA1.0 h
4.0 hours of engineering $750
Get help mitigating

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $1,200.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2024-34527 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

Get it on GitHub Scan in the browser

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2024-34527 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data