Stack-based Buffer OverflowWeakness · CWE-121

CVE-2024-34579

HIGH · 7.8 CVSS v3.1 Published 2025-01-17
Mitigation only
No fix yet — a mitigation exists. There is no fixed release. A documented workaround reduces exposure in the meantime.
See remediation →
81/100
Remediation priority · High
No privileges

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
Fuji Electric Alpha5 SMART is vulnerable to a stack-based buffer overflow, which may allow an attacker to execute arbitrary code.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · moderate confidence

Fuji Electric Alpha5 SMART contains a stack-based buffer overflow vulnerability that could allow an attacker to execute arbitrary code by overflowing a stack-allocated buffer, likely through malformed input or unexpected data processing.

MitigationContact Fuji Electric for available patches and security updates. Until a patch is available, implement network segmentation and restrict access to affected systems. If possible, monitor for indicators of compromise and consider compensating controls such as application whitelisting.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Local
Complexity
Low
Privileges
None
User interaction
Required
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
High
Availability
High

CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Confirm installation of Fuji Electric Alpha5 SMART
    Check system programs or application inventory for 'Fuji Electric Alpha5 SMART' or 'Alpha5 SMART' entry. Look in Add/Remove Programs on Windows or package manager listings on applicable systems.
    Affected if The software is not present in the system inventory or program listings, then the system is not affected by this specific CVE.
  2. Identify installed version of Alpha5 SMART
    Locate the installed Alpha5 SMART application and check its version property. Common locations: Help > About menu within the application, or right-click the executable in Program Files and select Properties > Details. Note the full version number (e.g., Ver.x.x.x).
    Affected if The installed version falls within the affected version range if any has been published by Fuji Electric; if the version is unknown or unpatched, treat it as potentially affected.
  3. Determine if network communication or data input features are active
    Review Alpha5 SMART configuration or project settings for enabled communication modules (e.g., serial, Ethernet, Modbus, or external data import features). Check if the application is configured to accept remote or external data inputs.
    Affected if Network or data input features are enabled and the application processes external or malformed data, creating the conditions for the buffer overflow to be triggered.
  4. Inspect access controls and network exposure
    Verify network firewall rules or ACLs protecting the system running Alpha5 SMART. Check if the application port or service is exposed to untrusted networks or directly accessible from the internet.
    Affected if The Alpha5 SMART service or its communication ports are accessible from untrusted networks, increasing the likelihood of attack delivery.

A system is affected if Fuji Electric Alpha5 SMART is installed with a vulnerable version and network or data input features are enabled, allowing external malformed input to reach the application.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

From vendor data
Mitigation available No clean upgrade yet — mitigate in the meantime
Mitigation

Contact Fuji Electric for available patches and security updates. Until a patch is available, implement network segmentation and restrict access to affected systems. If possible, monitor for indicators of compromise and consider compensating controls such as application whitelisting.

Have this fixed Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation3.0 h
  • Implementation6.0 h
  • Testing5.0 h
  • Review / QA3.0 h
17.0 hours of engineering $2,970
Get help mitigating

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $4,752.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2024-34579 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2024-34579 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data