Infosphere Information ServerApplication · Ibm

CVE-2024-35119

MEDIUM · 5.3 CVSS v3.1 Published 2024-06-30
Mitigation only
No fix yet — a mitigation exists. There is no fixed release. A documented workaround reduces exposure in the meantime.
See remediation →
62/100
Remediation priority · Elevated
Remotely reachable No privileges Zero-click

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
IBM InfoSphere Information Server 11.7 could allow a remote attacker to obtain sensitive information when a detailed technical error message is returned in a stack trace. This information could be used in further attacks against the system. IBM X-Force ID: 290342.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · high confidence

IBM InfoSphere Information Server 11.7 returns detailed technical error messages including stack traces to users, allowing remote attackers to gain sensitive system information such as file paths, library versions, and internal logic that could aid in further attacks.

MitigationConfigure the application server to disable detailed error messages and stack trace display; implement custom error pages that return generic error responses without exposing technical details.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.

NVD · CPE data
Infosphere Information ServerApplication
Affected:= 11.7

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Privileges
None
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
Low
Integrity
None
Availability
None

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Verify IBM InfoSphere Information Server version
    Locate the installation directory (typically in /opt/IBM/InformationServer or C:\IBM\InformationServer) and check the version file or use the versionInfo.sh/vbs script in the ASBNode/bin directory
    Affected if The installed version is exactly 11.7
  2. Check WebSphere application server error handling configuration
    Access the WebSphere Application Server admin console (typically port 9443 or 9060) and navigate to Servers > Application Servers > [server_name] > Web container > Custom Properties, or check the server.xml file in the WebSphere config directory for 'propfile.encoding' or error page settings
    Affected if Detailed error messages or stack traces are enabled in the application server configuration
  3. Inspect custom error page configuration
    Check the web.xml deployment descriptor in the installed applications (found in the WAScelldir/node/applications directory or the WAR file WEB-INF/web.xml) for <error-page> mappings and verify they point to generic error pages rather than exposing stack traces
    Affected if No custom error pages are configured or error pages expose technical details
  4. Test for error message disclosure
    Trigger a deliberate error condition by submitting malformed input to a known endpoint (such as a DataStage job parameter or XML input) or access a non-existent resource, then capture the HTTP response
    Affected if The response contains stack traces, file paths, library versions, or other technical implementation details

You are affected if IBM InfoSphere Information Server version 11.7 is running and the application returns detailed stack traces or technical error messages instead of generic error pages.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

From vendor data
Mitigation available No clean upgrade yet — mitigate in the meantime
Mitigation

Configure the application server to disable detailed error messages and stack trace display; implement custom error pages that return generic error responses without exposing technical details.

Fix this in Infosphere Information Server Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation3.0 h
  • Implementation4.0 h
  • Testing3.0 h
  • Review / QA2.0 h
12.0 hours of engineering $2,130
Get help mitigating

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,408.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2024-35119 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2024-35119 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data