CVE-2024-35133
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedIBM Security Verify Access 10.0.0 through 10.0.8 OIDC Provider could allow a remote authenticated attacker to conduct phishing attacks, using an open redirect attack. By persuading a victim to visit a specially crafted Web site, a remote attacker could exploit this vulnerability to spoof the URL displayed to redirect a user to a malicious Web site that would appear to be trusted. This could allow the attacker to obtain highly sensitive information or conduct further attacks against the victim.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceIBM Security Verify Access 10.0.0-10.0.8 OIDC Provider contains an open redirect vulnerability where an authenticated attacker can craft malicious URLs that appear to originate from the legitimate Verify Access domain but redirect users to attacker-controlled malicious sites, enabling phishing attacks.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data>= 10.0.0, <= 10.0.8>= 10.0.0, <= 10.0.8CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- Required
- Scope
- Changed
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- Low
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:L/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify IBM Security Verify Access installationCheck for the product by searching for verify access installation directories (commonly /opt/IBM/verify or C:\Program Files\IBM\Verify) or running 'docker ps' to look for verify access container imagesAffected if IBM Security Verify Access or its Docker variant is present on the system
-
Determine installed versionRun the product version command (typically 'verify version' or check /opt/IBM/verify/access/versions.txt on Linux, or docker images to check the image tag version)Affected if The installed version falls within 10.0.0 through 10.0.8 inclusive
-
Confirm OIDC Provider is configuredInspect the OIDC Provider configuration files in the verify access admin console or check for oidc configuration files in the configuration directory (typically under /var/Verify/oidc or the config/oidc path)Affected if OIDC Provider is enabled and configured with client registrations
-
Check redirect URI validation settingsReview the OIDC Provider client registration settings to see if redirect URIs are validated against a whitelist or if arbitrary external URLs are permittedAffected if The OIDC Provider allows redirect URIs to point to arbitrary external domains without strict validation or whitelist enforcement
You are affected if IBM Security Verify Access versions 10.0.0-10.0.8 are installed with OIDC Provider configured and redirect URI validation is not strictly enforced.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scopedUpgrade IBM Security Verify Access to a version beyond 10.0.8 or implement strict URL validation/whitelist controls in the OIDC Provider configuration to prevent untrusted redirect destinations.
10.0.9 or later (10.0.x series)
- 1. Identify the current IBM Security Verify Access version in use by checking the administration console or using the 'docker ps' command for containerized deployments
- 2. Review the release notes for IBM Security Verify Access version 10.0.9 or later for security fixes addressing CVE-2024-35133
- 3. Plan an upgrade to a fixed version (10.0.9 or later) following IBM's standard upgrade procedure
- 4. Before upgrading in production, test the new version in a non-production environment to verify compatibility with existing configurations
- 5. Backup the current configuration before performing the upgrade
- 6. Execute the upgrade process according to IBM's official documentation for your deployment type (traditional or Docker)
- 7. After upgrade, verify the OIDC Provider configuration and test that open redirect protections are functioning
- 8. Monitor for any anomalous redirects or phishing attempts in logs post-upgrade
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation3.0 h
- Implementation6.0 h
- Testing4.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $4,224.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2024-35133 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2024-35133 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data