CVE-2024-35145
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedIBM Maximo Application Suite 9.0.0 - Monitor Component is vulnerable to cross-site scripting. This vulnerability allows an unauthenticated attacker to embed arbitrary JavaScript code in the Web UI thus altering the intended functionality potentially leading to credentials disclosure within a trusted session.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceIBM Maximo Application Suite 9.0.0 Monitor Component contains a stored cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability allowing unauthenticated attackers to inject arbitrary JavaScript code into the Web UI, potentially enabling credential disclosure within trusted user sessions.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data= 9.0CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- Required
- Scope
- Changed
- Confidentiality
- Low
- Integrity
- Low
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify IBM Maximo Application Suite installationSearch for Maximo installation directories (commonly under /opt/ibm or C:\ibm\maximo), check for running processes named 'maximo' or 'MAS', or look for Maximo-related servicesAffected if IBM Maximo Application Suite is not found on the system - not applicable
-
Confirm installed version matches 9.0Check version files in the installation directory, examine the about/version page in the Maximo web UI, or run: psql -c "SELECT version FROM maximo.version" if database access is availableAffected if Installed version is exactly 9.0 - this matches the affected version range (= 9.0)
-
Verify Monitor Component is presentAccess Maximo admin console and check enabled components, or examine configuration files (like maximo.properties or ibmcloud.properties) for 'monitor' or 'Monitor' entriesAffected if Monitor Component is installed and enabled - this component contains the vulnerable Web UI where XSS can be injected
-
Check for XSS indicators in application logsSearch Maximo logs (under logs/ directory) for suspicious script tags, javascript: URIs, or event handlers like onload/onerror in user input fieldsAffected if Unusual script tags or JavaScript payloads appear in logs - may indicate exploitation attempts
A system is affected if IBM Maximo Application Suite version 9.0 is installed with the Monitor Component enabled, as this is the specific configuration where the stored XSS vulnerability in the Monitor Component Web UI can be triggered.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataImplement robust input validation and output encoding for all user-supplied data in the Monitor Component, and configure Content Security Policy headers to mitigate XSS execution.
- Consultation3.0 h
- Implementation6.0 h
- Testing3.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,984.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2024-35145 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2024-35145 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data