CVE-2024-35146
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedIBM Maximo Application Suite - Monitor Component 8.10.11, 8.11.8, and 9.0.0 is vulnerable to cross-site scripting. This vulnerability allows an unauthenticated attacker to embed arbitrary JavaScript code in the Web UI thus altering the intended functionality potentially leading to credentials disclosure within a trusted session.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceThis is a stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability in IBM Maximo Application Suite's Monitor Component affecting versions 8.10.11, 8.11.8, and 9.0.0. An unauthenticated attacker can inject malicious JavaScript into the web interface that executes within legitimate user sessions, potentially exfiltrating credentials or session tokens.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data= 8.10.11= 8.11.8= 9.0CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- Required
- Scope
- Changed
- Confidentiality
- Low
- Integrity
- Low
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify installed IBM Maximo Application Suite versionAccess the Maximo administrative console or About section to determine the exact product version. The version is typically visible in the system information or product details page.Affected if The installed version is 8.10.11, 8.11.8, or 9.0.0
-
Confirm Monitor Component is enabledVerify that the Monitor Component is active and accessible in the Maximo Application Suite deployment. Check the component list or module status through the administrative interface.Affected if Monitor Component is enabled and accessible to users
-
Check for suspicious input in Monitor ComponentReview any user-submitted data fields or entry points within the Monitor Component web interface for potential malicious scripts. Inspect stored data that may contain unsanitized input.Affected if Unsanitized user input containing script tags or javascript: URIs is present in Monitor Component data fields
-
Review web logs for XSS injection attemptsExamine server and application logs for patterns indicating XSS injection attempts targeting the Monitor Component, such as script tags or event handlers in input fields.Affected if Logs show recent injection attempts with XSS payloads targeting Monitor Component endpoints
A user is affected if they are running any of the specific affected versions (8.10.11, 8.11.8, or 9.0.0) with the Monitor Component exposed via the web interface.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataApply the vendor-supplied security patch for this vulnerability. Until patched, implement output encoding for all user-supplied data rendered in the web UI and consider deploying Content-Security-Policy headers to mitigate XSS execution.
- Consultation3.0 h
- Implementation6.0 h
- Testing3.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,984.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2024-35146 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2024-35146 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data