GuacamoleApplication · Apache

CVE-2024-35164

HIGH · 7.5 CVSS v3.1 Published 2025-07-02
Fix available
A fix is available. Upgrade to 1.6.0 or later.
See remediation →
81/100
Remediation priority · High
Remotely reachable Zero-click

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
The terminal emulator of Apache Guacamole 1.5.5 and older does not properly validate console codes received from servers via text-based protocols like SSH. If a malicious user has access to a text-based connection, a specially-crafted sequence of console codes could allow arbitrary code to be executed with the privileges of the running guacd process. Users are recommended to upgrade to version 1.6.0, which fixes this issue.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · high confidence

Apache Guacamole's terminal emulator in versions 1.5.5 and older fails to properly validate console codes received from servers via text-based protocols like SSH. A malicious user with access to a text-based connection can send specially-crafted console code sequences that enable arbitrary code execution with the privileges of the guacd daemon process.

MitigationUpgrade Apache Guacamole to version 1.6.0 or later, which contains the fix for proper console code validation in the terminal emulator.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.

NVD · CPE data
GuacamoleApplication
Affected:>= 0.8.0, < 1.6.0

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
High
Privileges
Low
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
High
Availability
High

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Identify Guacamole installation and version
    Locate the Apache Guacamole installation (client web app, guacd daemon, or libguac libraries) and retrieve its version number. Check package managers, installed files, or the guacd daemon version flag if available.
    Affected if The installed version is 0.8.0 or higher but lower than 1.6.0
  2. Determine if terminal emulator is in use
    Identify whether connections using text-based protocols (SSH, Telnet, or similar) are configured or active in the Guacamole environment. These connections use the terminal emulator component.
    Affected if Text-based protocol connections (SSH, Telnet) are created or configured in Guacamole, enabling the vulnerable terminal emulator component
  3. Verify guacd daemon is running
    Check if the guacd daemon process is active. This is the service that handles Guacamole connections and would execute code with its privileges if exploited.
    Affected if The guacd daemon is running and handling connections, which means it could be exploited to run code with its user-level privileges

You are affected if Apache Guacamole version is 1.5.5 or earlier (or any version >= 0.8.0 and < 1.6.0) and you use SSH or other text-based protocol connections that could receive console codes from remote servers.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

dbcve · scoped
Upgrade available Upgrade to 1.6.0 or later
Fixed in 1.6.0
Interim mitigation

Upgrade Apache Guacamole to version 1.6.0 or later, which contains the fix for proper console code validation in the terminal emulator.

Recommended fix High confidence

1.6.0

  1. Backup your current Guacamole configuration and any custom settings
  2. Stop the guacd service to ensure no active connections during upgrade
  3. Install or upgrade to Apache Guacamole version 1.6.0 using your distribution's package manager or by compiling from source
  4. Restart the guacd service to apply the updated version
  5. Verify the installation by checking the guacd version and ensuring all connections work properly
Caveat Review the 1.6.0 release notes for any configuration changes or deprecations relevant to your deployment before upgrading

Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.

Fix this in Guacamole Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation3.0 h
  • Implementation2.0 h
  • Testing4.0 h
  • Review / QA2.0 h
11.0 hours of engineering $1,920
Get the upgrade done

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,072.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2024-35164 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2024-35164 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data