CVE-2024-35239
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedUmbraco Commerce is an open source dotnet web forms solution. In affected versions an authenticated user that has access to edit Forms may inject unsafe code into Forms components. This issue can be mitigated by configuring TitleAndDescription:AllowUnsafeHtmlRendering after upgrading to one of the patched versions (13.0.1, 12.2.2, 10.5.3, 8.13.13).
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceAuthenticated users with Forms edit access can inject unsafe HTML/script code into Forms components in Umbraco Commerce, representing a stored XSS vulnerability. The vulnerability stems from insufficient sanitization of user-supplied content in Title and Description fields. Patched versions 13.0.1, 12.2.2, 10.5.3, and 8.13.13 address this, with additional mitigation available via the TitleAndDescription:AllowUnsafeHtmlRendering configuration setting.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data< 8.13.13>= 9.0.0, < 10.5.3>= 11.0.0, < 12.2.2>= 13.0.0, < 13.0.1CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- Required
- Scope
- Changed
- Confidentiality
- Low
- Integrity
- Low
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Determine installed Umbraco Forms versionLocate the Umbraco Forms package version from the solution's packages.config, .csproj references, or the installed packages list in the Umbraco backoffice under the 'Packages' sectionAffected if The installed version falls within any of these ranges: < 8.13.13; >= 9.0.0 and < 10.5.3; >= 11.0.0 and < 12.2.2; >= 13.0.0 and < 13.0.1
-
Locate the Forms configuration fileFind the Umbraco Forms configuration file, typically named Umbraco.Forms.config or found within the App_Config/UmbracoForms folder in the application rootAffected if The configuration file exists and contains the TitleAndDescription section
-
Check AllowUnsafeHtmlRendering settingInspect the configuration for the TitleAndDescription:AllowUnsafeHtmlRendering setting; if absent, the default behavior applies (unsafe HTML is rendered)Affected if The setting is either absent (defaulting to unsafe rendering) or set to true/enabled, meaning HTML/script in Title and Description fields is rendered without sanitization
You are affected if your Umbraco Forms version is within the vulnerable ranges AND users with Forms edit access can create or modify Forms with Title or Description fields containing unsanitized HTML or script content.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped8.13.1310.5.312.2.2
Upgrade to a patched version (13.0.1, 12.2.2, 10.5.3, or 8.13.13) and configure TitleAndDescription:AllowUnsafeHtmlRendering to disable unsafe HTML rendering in Forms components.
Umbraco Forms 8.13.13, 10.5.3, 12.2.2, or 13.0.1 depending on your current major version branch
- 1. Identify your current Umbraco Forms version by checking the installed package version in your project or Umbraco backoffice.
- 2. Determine which upgrade path applies based on your current major version: for versions < 8.x upgrade to 8.13.13; for 9.x-10.x upgrade to 10.5.3; for 11.x upgrade to 12.2.2; for 13.x upgrade to 13.0.1.
- 3. Update the Umbraco Forms NuGet package in your project to the appropriate fixed version, or use the Umbraco backoffice package manager to install the patched version.
- 4. Test the upgrade in a non-production environment first to verify compatibility with your custom code and other installed packages.
- 5. After upgrading, to further mitigate XSS risk, configure the TitleAndDescription:AllowUnsafeHtmlRendering setting in your configuration files (appsettings.json or equivalent) to disable unsafe HTML rendering if not already disabled by default.
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation3.0 h
- Implementation4.0 h
- Testing3.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,408.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2024-35239 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2024-35239 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data