CVE-2024-35280
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedA improper neutralization of input during web page generation ('cross-site scripting') vulnerability in Fortinet FortiDeceptor 5.3.0, FortiDeceptor 5.2.0, FortiDeceptor 5.1 all versions, FortiDeceptor 5.0 all versions, FortiDeceptor 4.3 all versions, FortiDeceptor 4.2 all versions, FortiDeceptor 4.1 all versions, FortiDeceptor 4.0 all versions, FortiDeceptor 3.3 all versions, FortiDeceptor 3.2 all versions, FortiDeceptor 3.1 all versions, FortiDeceptor 3.0 all versions may allow an attacker to perform a reflected cross-site scripting attack in the recovery endpoints
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceA reflected cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability exists in FortiDeceptor's recovery endpoints. The vulnerability stems from improper neutralization of user-supplied input during web page generation, allowing attackers to inject malicious scripts that execute in victim browsers when they interact with specially crafted URLs.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data>= 3.0.0, < 5.2.1= 5.3.0CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- Required
- Scope
- Changed
- Confidentiality
- Low
- Integrity
- Low
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Check FortiDeceptor firmware versionAccess the FortiDeceptor CLI and run the command 'get system status' or 'fnsysctl get system version' to retrieve the installed firmware version. Alternatively, check via the web GUI by logging in and viewing the system dashboard or firmware information page.Affected if The installed version is 3.0.0 through 5.2.0 inclusive, or exactly version 5.3.0.
-
Verify web interface is enabledIn the FortiDeceptor CLI, run 'get system interface' or check the web interface access configuration to confirm that the management web GUI or HTTP/HTTPS access is enabled on any interface.Affected if The web interface is accessible, as the XSS vulnerability exists in the recovery web endpoints.
-
Identify exposed recovery endpointsFrom an external host, attempt to access common recovery paths such as '/recovery', '/recover', '/maintenance', or '/password-reset' via HTTP or HTTPS on the FortiDeceptor IP address. Use a web browser or curl to probe these endpoints.Affected if Any recovery endpoints are accessible over the network without authentication or with minimal auth, indicating the vulnerable code path may be reachable.
-
Review access policy for recovery URLsIn the FortiDeceptor web GUI or CLI, examine the firewall policy or explicit proxy configuration to determine if policies allow external access to the recovery endpoint URLs. Check for any policies with 'recovery' or 'maintenance' in the destination or service configuration.Affected if Policies permit unrestricted or unauthenticated access to recovery endpoints from untrusted networks.
If the FortiDeceptor version is 3.0.0-5.2.0 or 5.3.0 AND the web interface or recovery endpoints are network-accessible, the environment is affected by this reflected XSS vulnerability.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped5.2.1
Apply vendor-supplied patches for FortiDeceptor or upgrade to a patched version. Until patches are applied, sanitize all user input in recovery endpoints and implement Content Security Policy headers to mitigate XSS risks.
FortiDeceptor 5.4.0 or later
- 1. Identify the current FortiDeceptor version via the web GUI (System > Settings > Firmware) or CLI: `get system status`
- 2. Download the fixed firmware version 5.4.0 or later from Fortinet Customer Support portal (https://support.fortinet.com)
- 3. Back up the FortiDeceptor configuration via GUI (System > Maintenance > Backup & Restore) or CLI: `execute backup full-config`
- 4. Upload and install the firmware upgrade via GUI (System > Settings > Firmware) or CLI: `execute system firmware-upgrade`
- 5. After upgrade, verify the version is no longer vulnerable (>= 5.4.0)
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation4.0 h
- Testing3.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,088.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2024-35280 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2024-35280 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data