CVE-2024-36049
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedAptos Wisal payroll accounting before 7.1.6 uses hardcoded credentials in the Windows client to fetch the complete list of usernames and passwords from the database server, using an unencrypted connection. This allows attackers in a machine-in-the-middle position read and write access to personally identifiable information (PII) and especially payroll data and the ability to impersonate legitimate users with respect to the audit log.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceAptos Wisal payroll accounting software before version 7.1.6 contains hardcoded credentials embedded in the Windows client that authenticate to the database server. The client retrieves the complete username and password list from the database over an unencrypted connection, allowing a man-in-the-middle attacker to intercept credentials and gain read/write access to PII and payroll data, plus impersonate users in audit logs.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- Required
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Locate Aptos Wisal installationCheck common installation paths such as C:\Program Files\Aptos\WISAL or C:\Program Files (x86)\Aptos\WISAL, and look for the wisal.exe or WISAL application in Windows Programs and Features.Affected if Aptos Wisal payroll software is found on the system
-
Determine installed versionRight-click the main executable (usually wisal.exe) in the installation folder, select Properties, and check the File Version field. Alternatively, open the software and look for an About or Help menu showing the version number.Affected if The version number is lower than 7.1.6 (e.g., 7.1.5, 7.1.0, etc.)
-
Check for embedded credentials in client binariesUse a text or hex editor to open the main client executable (wisal.exe) and search for strings resembling database connection parameters such as 'password', 'pwd', 'user', or 'connection'. Look for hardcoded plain-text credentials or connection strings.Affected if Hardcoded credentials, connection strings, or plaintext passwords are found embedded in the client binary
-
Inspect database connection configurationExamine configuration files in the installation directory (such as config.ini, settings.xml, or .cfg files) for database server addresses, usernames, and passwords. Check if the connection string indicates unencrypted or plaintext communication.Affected if Configuration files contain unencrypted database credentials or show no encryption (e.g., no SSL/TLS flags)
-
Verify network traffic encryptionUse a network packet capture tool (such as Wireshark) on the client machine while the software connects to the database server. Verify whether the database traffic (typically port 1433 for SQL Server or 3306 for MySQL) is encrypted.Affected if Database traffic is transmitted in plaintext without TLS/SSL encryption
A user is affected if Aptos Wisal version 7.1.6 or higher is not installed, and the software uses hardcoded credentials with unencrypted database connections.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scopedUpgrade to Aptos Wisal version 7.1.6 or later which removes hardcoded credentials and implements proper authentication. Avoid using the affected software on untrusted networks until patched.
7.1.6
- Identify the current installed version of Aptos Wisal payroll accounting software
- Contact Aptos official support to obtain version 7.1.6 or later which contains the security fix
- Follow Aptos standard upgrade procedure to install the patched version
- After upgrading, change all hardcoded database credentials to use secure, unique credentials managed through proper authentication mechanisms
- Verify that database connections now use encrypted connections (e.g., TLS/SSL)
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation16.0 h
- Testing8.0 h
- Review / QA4.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $8,960.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2024-36049 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2024-36049 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data