Improper Access ControlWeakness · CWE-284

CVE-2024-36080

CRITICAL · 9.8 CVSS v3.1 Published 2024-05-19
Mitigation only
No fix yet — a mitigation exists. There is no fixed release. A documented workaround reduces exposure in the meantime.
See remediation →
100/100
Remediation priority · Urgent
Remotely reachable No privileges Zero-click

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
Westermo EDW-100 devices through 2024-05-03 have a hidden root user account with a hardcoded password that cannot be changed. NOTE: this is a serial-to-Ethernet converter that should not be placed at the edge of the network.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · high confidence

The Westermo EDW-100 serial-to-Ethernet converter contains a hidden root user account with a hardcoded password that cannot be changed by administrators. This backdoor allows remote attackers to gain full root access to the device, completely bypassing authentication controls.

MitigationSince the hardcoded password cannot be changed, network segmentation is essential—do not expose these devices at network edges. Contact Westermo for firmware updates; if unavailable, consider device replacement. Apply compensating controls like firewalls and ACLs to restrict access to affected devices.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Privileges
None
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
High
Availability
High

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Identify the device model
    Access the device web interface, CLI, or check the device label/packaging to confirm the exact model number is Westermo EDW-100
    Affected if The device is a Westermo EDW-100 serial-to-Ethernet converter
  2. Check for unexpected user accounts
    Log into the device admin interface and navigate to User Management or Account settings. List all configured user accounts and look for any account other than those created by your organization, especially any root-level or administrator account you did not create
    Affected if There is a hidden or unknown root or administrator account present that was not created by your organization
  3. Verify account mutability
    Attempt to modify or delete any discovered accounts through the admin interface. Try to change the password or delete the root account if one exists. Note whether the system prevents modification or deletion of any account
    Affected if There exists a root or administrator account that cannot be modified or deleted through the admin interface
  4. Check for hardcoded credentials in configuration
    If you have access to the device firmware or configuration backups, examine for hardcoded username/password pairs. Look in firmware files, config exports, or system logs for root user entries with static passwords
    Affected if A hardcoded root password is found in firmware, configuration files, or logs
  5. Review remote access settings
    Check the device network settings for enabled remote access protocols such as Telnet, SSH, or web management. Determine if these services are accessible from untrusted networks
    Affected if Remote management interfaces (Telnet/SSH/HTTP) are enabled and accessible from outside your trusted network

You are affected if you have a Westermo EDW-100 device with an unrecognized, immutable root account that provides full device access.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

From vendor data
Mitigation available No clean upgrade yet — mitigate in the meantime
Mitigation

Since the hardcoded password cannot be changed, network segmentation is essential—do not expose these devices at network edges. Contact Westermo for firmware updates; if unavailable, consider device replacement. Apply compensating controls like firewalls and ACLs to restrict access to affected devices.

Have this fixed Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation3.0 h
  • Implementation4.0 h
  • Testing2.0 h
  • Review / QA1.0 h
10.0 hours of engineering $1,800
Get help mitigating

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $2,880.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2024-36080 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2024-36080 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data