CVE-2024-36143
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedAdobe Experience Manager versions 6.5.20 and earlier are affected by a stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability that could be abused by an attacker to inject malicious scripts into vulnerable form fields. Malicious JavaScript may be executed in a victim’s browser when they browse to the page containing the vulnerable field.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceAdobe Experience Manager versions 6.5.20 and earlier contain a stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability. Attackers can inject malicious JavaScript into vulnerable form fields, which persists in the system and executes when legitimate users view pages containing the affected fields.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data< 6.5.21< 2024.5CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- Required
- Scope
- Changed
- Confidentiality
- Low
- Integrity
- Low
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Determine installed AEM versionNavigate to AEM welcome page (/) or access /system/console/status/productinfo to retrieve the version number. Alternatively, check the version.properties file in the crx-quickstart folder.Affected if The version is 6.5.20 or earlier, or the version is below 2024.5 (for cloud/2024 releases).
-
Identify Adaptive Forms or custom form componentsCheck for the presence of Adaptive Forms by navigating to Forms > Forms & Documents in AEM Assets, or search for custom form components in the CRX/DE repository under /apps. Look for content fragments or form fragments that accept user input.Affected if AEM Forms or custom form components are present and the AEM version is in the affected range.
-
Review form field configurations for missing output encodingIn CRX/DE, examine the JSP or HTL files for form input components (such as text fields, textareas, or dropdowns) under /libs/foundation/components or custom form components. Check whether the values are rendered using proper encoding functions (for example, encodeForHTML or equivalent XSS protection).Affected if Form components use raw output (no encoding) when displaying submitted values back to users.
-
Inspect stored form data for malicious scriptsQuery the repository using CRXDE or the Query Builder to search for stored form submissions containing script tags or JavaScript event handlers (such as <script>, onerror=, onload=, javascript:) in text fields.Affected if Form submissions in the repository contain unencoded script tags or JavaScript event handlers.
You are affected if your AEM version is below 6.5.21 (or below 2024.5 for cloud releases) AND you have Adaptive Forms or custom form components that accept user input without proper output encoding.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped6.5.212024.5
Upgrade Adobe Experience Manager to a version newer than 6.5.20. Additionally, implement input validation and output encoding for form fields, and consider Content Security Policy headers to mitigate XSS risks.
AEM 6.5.21 (for 6.5.x branch) or AEM 2024.5 (for Cloud/2024.x branch)
- Identify your current Adobe Experience Manager version by checking the Product Information in AEM (go to Help > About Adobe Experience Manager)
- For AEM 6.5.x installations: Plan upgrade to version 6.5.21 or later
- For AEM Cloud/2024.x installations: Plan upgrade to version 2024.5 or later
- Before upgrading, review Adobe's release notes and perform a full backup of the environment
- Test the upgrade in a staging environment before deploying to production
- Schedule maintenance window and deploy the upgrade
- After upgrade, verify that the XSS vulnerability is resolved by testing the affected form fields
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation8.0 h
- Testing6.0 h
- Review / QA3.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $5,888.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2024-36143 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2024-36143 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data