CVE-2024-36160
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedAdobe Experience Manager versions 6.5.20 and earlier are affected by a stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability that could be abused by an attacker to inject malicious scripts into vulnerable form fields. Malicious JavaScript may be executed in a victim’s browser when they browse to the page containing the vulnerable field.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceAdobe Experience Manager versions 6.5.20 and earlier contain a stored (persistent) Cross-Site Scripting vulnerability where malicious JavaScript can be injected into form fields. The injected payload is stored in the system and executes in victims' browsers when they view pages containing the compromised form fields.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data< 6.5.21< 2024.5CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- Required
- Scope
- Changed
- Confidentiality
- Low
- Integrity
- Low
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Check your Adobe Experience Manager versionAccess the AEM Web Console (usually at /system/console/bundles or /system/console/about.html) or check the manifest file in the installation directory to identify the exact AEM version installedAffected if The installed version is 6.5.20 or earlier, OR earlier than the 2024.5 release
-
Determine if AEM Forms or form components are in useReview your AEM instance for any active forms, adaptive forms, form workflows, or custom form field components. Check the Forms section in AEM Assets or the forms dashboard at /aem/formsAffected if Forms or form-based workflows are configured and accepting user input
-
Inspect stored form content for injected scriptsQuery the AEM content repository (via CRXDE Lite at /crx/de or the Query tool) for common XSS patterns in form field nodes. Search for script tags, javascript: URIs, event handlers like onload/onerror/onclick, or encoded variants in content nodes under /content or /etcAffected if Any form field content contains suspicious script tags, JavaScript URIs, or known XSS payloads
-
Review recent form submission or workflow historyCheck the AEM Workflow Inbox and form submission logs for any recent entries containing unusual characters or script-related content. Also review any custom form validation or submission handlersAffected if Recent form submissions contain unexpected HTML, script tags, or JavaScript code in field values
You are affected if your AEM version is 6.5.20 or earlier (or pre-2024.5) AND you have forms accepting user input where malicious scripts could be stored and rendered to other users.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped6.5.212024.5
Upgrade to Adobe Experience Manager version 6.5.21 or later. Additionally, implement proper input validation and output encoding for all form fields, and consider deploying Content Security Policy (CSP) headers to mitigate XSS execution.
AEM 6.5.21 or later, or AEM 2024.5 or later (depending on your deployment model)
- Review the Adobe Experience Manager upgrade documentation at helpx.adobe.com for your current version
- Ensure you have a complete backup of your AEM instance and content repository before proceeding
- Test the upgrade in a non-production environment first
- For AEM 6.5.x deployments: Upgrade to AEM 6.5.21 or later
- For AEM as a Cloud Service deployments: Upgrade to 2024.5 or later
- Verify the upgrade was successful by logging into the AEM console
- Test the specific form fields mentioned in your application to confirm the XSS vulnerability is remediated
- Deploy the upgraded version to production following your organization's change management process
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation3.0 h
- Implementation6.0 h
- Testing3.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,984.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2024-36160 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2024-36160 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data