CVE-2024-36173
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedAdobe Experience Manager versions 6.5.20 and earlier are affected by a stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability that could be abused by an attacker to inject malicious scripts into vulnerable form fields. Malicious JavaScript may be executed in a victim’s browser when they browse to the page containing the vulnerable field.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceAdobe Experience Manager versions 6.5.20 and earlier contain a stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability in form fields. Attackers can inject malicious JavaScript into vulnerable form inputs, which persists on the server and executes in victims' browsers when they view the affected pages.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data< 6.5.21< 2024.5CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- Required
- Scope
- Changed
- Confidentiality
- Low
- Integrity
- Low
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Determine your AEM versionNavigate to the AEM Welcome page or access the system/console/info page (typically at /system/console/info) to view the installed AEM product versionAffected if Version is below 6.5.21 or below 2024.5 (for cloud/2024 releases)
-
Identify custom form components in useReview the AEM Forms implementation or check the /apps folder for custom form components that collect user input, particularly those extending core form field componentsAffected if Custom or extended form components exist that handle user-submitted data
-
Inspect form field input handlingExamine the HTL/Sightly templates or JSP scripts for form input fields (found under /apps or /libs) to determine whether output encoding is applied to user-supplied values when renderedAffected if Form field templates render user input without applying encoding functions such as encodingForHTML or equivalent sanitization
-
Check form data storage for suspicious contentQuery the JCR (Java Content Repository) or form data stores for unusual script tags or JavaScript syntax in form submission fields, using tools like CRXDE Lite or AEM Query BuilderAffected if Stored form submissions contain unescaped HTML script tags or javascript: URIs in input fields
You are affected if your AEM version is below 6.5.21 (or below 2024.5 for newer releases) AND your forms render user-submitted input without proper output encoding.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped6.5.212024.5
Apply AEM 6.5.21 or later patch; implement input validation and output encoding for form fields; configure Content Security Policy headers to mitigate XSS execution.
AEM 6.5.21+ or AEM 2024.6+ (depending on release train)
- 1. Identify which Adobe Experience Manager release train you are using (6.5.x or 2024.x)
- 2. If using AEM 6.5.x release train, schedule upgrade to version 6.5.21 or later
- 3. If using AEM 2024.x release train, schedule upgrade to version 2024.6 or later
- 4. Before production deployment, test the upgraded version in a staging environment to verify compatibility with custom code and integrations
- 5. After upgrade, verify that the XSS vulnerability is resolved by testing the previously vulnerable form fields
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation6.0 h
- Implementation12.0 h
- Testing6.0 h
- Review / QA4.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $7,968.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2024-36173 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2024-36173 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data