CVE-2024-36181
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedAdobe Experience Manager versions 6.5.20 and earlier are affected by a DOM-based Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability. This vulnerability could allow an attacker to execute arbitrary JavaScript code in the context of the victim's browser session. Exploitation of this issue requires user interaction, typically in the form of convincing a victim to visit a maliciously crafted web page or to interact with a maliciously modified DOM element within the application.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceAdobe Experience Manager versions 6.5.20 and earlier contain a DOM-based Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability where malicious input can be injected into the DOM and executed in a victim's browser context. The vulnerability requires user interaction, such as tricking a victim into visiting a crafted URL or interacting with a maliciously modified DOM element within the application.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data< 6.5.21< 2024.5CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- Required
- Scope
- Changed
- Confidentiality
- Low
- Integrity
- Low
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify AEM versionAccess the AEM welcome page or check the productinfo endpoint at /libs/cq/core/content/platform.html, or look for version.info in the system console at /system/console/bundlesAffected if The version displayed is 6.5.20 or earlier, or between 6.5.0 and 2024.4, indicating it falls below the patched releases of 6.5.21 or 2024.5
-
Verify AEM 6.5.x release lineIf running AEM 6.5.x, compare the exact minor version shown in the version information against the affected range ending at 6.5.20Affected if The installed 6.5.x version is 6.5.20 or any earlier 6.5.x release
-
Verify AEM as a Cloud Service releaseIf running AEM as a Cloud Service, check the release version number shown in the system console or release notesAffected if The Cloud Service version is earlier than the 2024.5 release (for example, 2024.1 through 2024.4)
-
Inspect Content Security Policy headersUse browser developer tools or a curl command to inspect the HTTP response headers from the AEM instance for Content-Security-Policy directivesAffected if No CSP headers are present, or CSP headers allow unsafe-inline scripts, which would permit DOM XSS execution if the vulnerable code path exists
A user is affected if their AEM installation shows version 6.5.20 or earlier for the 6.5.x line, or any version before 2024.5 for the Cloud Service release, and the application lacks proper CSP protection.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped6.5.212024.5
Apply the vendor patch (upgrade to AEM 6.5.21 or later) and implement Content Security Policy headers to mitigate XSS execution. Additionally, review and sanitize any user-supplied input that gets reflected into the DOM.
AEM 6.5.21 (for 6.5.x branches) or AEM as a Cloud Service 2024.5
- Back up the current Adobe Experience Manager instance and all content repositories
- Review Adobe's official upgrade documentation for AEM 6.5.21 or for AEM as a Cloud Service 2024.5
- Test the upgrade in a non-production environment to ensure compatibility with custom code and configurations
- Upgrade AEM 6.5.x installations to version 6.5.21 or later
- Upgrade AEM as a Cloud Service to version 2024.5 or later
- Verify the DOM-based XSS vulnerability is resolved by testing the previously vulnerable vectors
- Deploy the upgraded version to production after validation
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation6.0 h
- Testing4.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $4,544.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2024-36181 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2024-36181 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data