CVE-2024-36182
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedAdobe Experience Manager versions 6.5.20 and earlier are affected by a stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability that could be abused by an attacker to inject malicious scripts into vulnerable form fields. Malicious JavaScript may be executed in a victim’s browser when they browse to the page containing the vulnerable field.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceAdobe Experience Manager versions 6.5.20 and earlier contain a stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability in form fields. Attackers can inject malicious JavaScript that persists in the system and executes when victims view affected pages in their browsers.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data< 6.5.21< 2024.5CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- Required
- Scope
- Changed
- Confidentiality
- Low
- Integrity
- Low
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Check installed AEM versionAccess the AEM System Information console or check the version.properties file in the crx-quickstart folder. Compare the version number against the affected ranges: versions before 6.5.21 or releases before 2024.5Affected if The installed version is less than 6.5.21 or the 2024.5 release
-
Identify if AEM Forms module is in useVerify whether the AEM Forms component is enabled on the instance by reviewing the installed packages in the Package Manager or checking the Felix Console for Forms-related bundlesAffected if AEM Forms module is installed and active on the instance
-
Review form field configurations for input validationInspect the form field definitions in the CRX/DE repository under /libs or /apps for the specific forms in use. Check whether each form field has validation rules configured to sanitize user inputAffected if Form fields lack input validation or sanitization rules configured
-
Examine stored form data for malicious scriptsQuery the form data stored in the repository or database for patterns matching script tags, javascript: URIs, or other XSS payloads in form submission fieldsAffected if Form submissions contain persisted JavaScript code or HTML tags in input fields
-
Check for unauthorized form definition changesReview the audit logs or version history of form container components in the CRX/DE repository to identify recent modifications that may have introduced vulnerable configurationsAffected if Form definitions were modified without documented change control
You are affected if your AEM version is below 6.5.21 or prior to 2024.5 AND you have the Forms module enabled with form fields that lack input sanitization.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped6.5.212024.5
Apply the vendor patch (AEM 6.5.21 or later) and implement input validation/sanitization on all form fields to prevent script injection.
Adobe Experience Manager 6.5.21 or later, or 2024.5 or later
- 1. Back up your current Adobe Experience Manager instance, including the repository, database, and configurations
- 2. Download the fixed version of Adobe Experience Manager (6.5.21 or later for 6.x line; 2024.5 or later for 2024 line) from Adobe's official distribution or support portal
- 3. Stop the running AEM instance and any related services
- 4. Install the upgrade following Adobe's documented upgrade procedure for your specific version path
- 5. After installation, verify the AEM instance starts successfully
- 6. Test the previously vulnerable form fields to confirm the XSS vulnerability is remediated
- 7. Clear browser caches and test in multiple browsers to ensure the fix is effective
- 8. Monitor logs and system behavior post-upgrade for any anomalies
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation3.0 h
- Implementation6.0 h
- Testing3.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,984.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2024-36182 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2024-36182 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data