CVE-2024-36183
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedAdobe Experience Manager versions 6.5.20 and earlier Answer: are affected by a DOM-based Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability. This vulnerability could allow an attacker to execute arbitrary JavaScript code in the context of the victim's browser session. Exploitation of this issue typically requires user interaction, such as convincing a user to click on a specially crafted link or to submit a malicious form.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceAdobe Experience Manager versions 6.5.20 and earlier contain a DOM-based Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability. This client-side vulnerability allows attackers to inject malicious JavaScript through manipulated URLs or forms, which executes in victims' browsers within their session context. User interaction (clicking a crafted link or submitting a malicious form) is required for exploitation.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data< 6.5.21< 2024.5CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- Required
- Scope
- Changed
- Confidentiality
- Low
- Integrity
- Low
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify installed AEM versionLog into AEM as administrator and navigate to 'Help' > 'System Information' > 'Version' in the AEM console, or check the 'version.properties' file in the crx-quickstart folderAffected if The version shown is below 6.5.21 or below 2024.5 (for cloud/2024 releases)
-
Confirm AEM deployment typeDetermine if the instance is AEM 6.5 on-premise or AEM as a Cloud Service, as the version numbering differs between themAffected if The deployment uses AEM 6.5 version below 6.5.21, or the 2024.x release line below 2024.5
-
Review custom components for URL parameter handlingSearch the codebase for custom components that use request.getParameter() or similar methods and output results directly to HTML without proper encoding (search for 'getParameter' in JSP/HTL files under /apps)Affected if Custom components exist that retrieve URL parameters and render them in the page without sanitization
-
Audit DOM manipulation patternsSearch client-side JavaScript files (under /apps) for patterns like innerHTML, outerHTML, or document.write that accept URL-derived values without encodingAffected if Custom client-side scripts use unsanitized user input in DOM operations
-
Examine form handling for XSS vectorsReview custom form components or cq:dialog configurations that accept user input and display it back, checking if they use proper XSS protection APIs provided by AEMAffected if Custom forms exist that reflect submitted values without using AEM's XSS protection functions
You are affected if your AEM version is below 6.5.21 (on-premise 6.5) or below 2024.5 (2024 releases), or if custom components improperly handle URL parameters or DOM input without encoding.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped6.5.212024.5
Apply Adobe's official patch by upgrading to AEM 6.5.21 or later. Additionally, audit custom AEM components for improper handling of URL parameters or DOM manipulation that could introduce similar XSS vectors.
Adobe Experience Manager 6.5.21 (for 6.5.x branch) or 2024.5 (for 2024.x branch)
- 1. Back up the current AEM instance including repository, database, and configurations
- 2. Review Adobe's official upgrade documentation for AEM 6.5.21 or 2024.5 at helpx.adobe.com
- 3. Test the upgrade in a non-production/staging environment before applying to production
- 4. Apply the upgrade to AEM 6.5.21 or later (for 6.5.x branch) OR to 2024.5 or later (for 2024.x branch)
- 5. Verify the XSS vulnerability is resolved by testing with the identified attack vectors
- 6. Deploy the tested upgrade to production
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation3.0 h
- Implementation6.0 h
- Testing6.0 h
- Review / QA3.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $4,992.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2024-36183 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2024-36183 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data