CVE-2024-36185
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedAdobe Experience Manager versions 6.5.20 and earlier are affected by a stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability that could be abused by an attacker to inject malicious scripts into vulnerable form fields. Malicious JavaScript may be executed in a victim’s browser when they browse to the page containing the vulnerable field.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceAdobe Experience Manager versions 6.5.20 and earlier contain a stored Cross-Site Scripting vulnerability in form fields where malicious JavaScript can be injected and persists in the system, executing when users view the affected page in their browser.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data< 6.5.21< 2024.5CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- Required
- Scope
- Changed
- Confidentiality
- Low
- Integrity
- Low
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Check installed AEM versionNavigate to the AEM Welcome page or check the com.adobe.version file in the crx-quickstart folder. Alternatively, query the system console at /system/console/bundles to find the AEM version information.Affected if The installed version is 6.5.20 or earlier, or falls between 6.5.21 and 2024.5 (i.e., < 6.5.21 AND < 2024.5)
-
Identify if AEM Forms are in useCheck if Form components or Adaptive Forms are created or enabled in the system by reviewing the content structure under /content/forms or /content/dam/forms for form assets.Affected if Form components or AEM Forms exist in the environment and the version is affected
-
Inspect stored form data for injected scriptsReview content stored in the JCR (Java Content Repository) under /content or specific form submission paths. Use CRXDE Lite at /crx/de to query for potential script tags in form field data.Affected if Form submissions or form field content contains unencoded script tags or JavaScript event handlers
-
Check for XSS vulnerable pages in form outputAccess published pages containing form fields and view the page source (right-click > View Page Source) to verify if form field values are properly HTML-encoded before rendering.Affected if Form field values render raw HTML or JavaScript without encoding when viewing the page
You are affected if your AEM version is below 6.5.21 or below 2024.5, and your environment uses form fields where malicious scripts could be stored and executed without proper output encoding.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped6.5.212024.5
Update Adobe Experience Manager to version 6.5.21 or later, or implement proper input validation and output encoding on vulnerable form fields to prevent script injection.
Adobe Experience Manager 6.5.21 or later (for 6.5.x line); Adobe Experience Manager 2024.5 or later (for 2024.x line)
- 1. Identify the current Adobe Experience Manager version in use (check /system/console/systeminfo or the About Adobe Experience Manager page)
- 2. If running 6.5.x line: plan upgrade to version 6.5.21 or later
- 3. If running 2024.x line: plan upgrade to version 2024.5 or later
- 4. Create a full backup of the AEM instance including the repository, configuration, and any custom code
- 5. Test the upgrade in a non-production environment first
- 6. Perform the upgrade following Adobe's standard upgrade documentation
- 7. Verify the upgrade was successful by checking the version
- 8. Test that the stored XSS vulnerability is remediated by attempting to inject script content into form fields
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation8.0 h
- Testing6.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $5,600.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2024-36185 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2024-36185 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data