CVE-2024-36224
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedAdobe Experience Manager versions 6.5.20 and earlier Answer: are affected by a DOM-based Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability. This vulnerability could allow an attacker to execute arbitrary JavaScript code in the context of the victim's browser session. Exploitation of this issue typically requires user interaction, such as convincing a user to click on a specially crafted link or to submit a form that causes the vulnerable script to execute.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceA DOM-based Cross-Site Scripting vulnerability in Adobe Experience Manager versions 6.5.20 and earlier allows attackers to inject malicious JavaScript into pages viewed by victims. The vulnerability requires user interaction such as clicking a crafted link or submitting a malicious form.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data< 6.5.21< 2024.5CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- Required
- Scope
- Changed
- Confidentiality
- Low
- Integrity
- Low
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Check AEM version in the OSGi consoleNavigate to the AEM Web Console (typically at /system/console/bundles) or access the product info page at /crx/packmgr/service.jsp?cmd=version to retrieve the installed AEM version numberAffected if The installed version is 6.5.20 or earlier, or the version is below 2024.5 (for newer release trains)
-
Verify the AEM release trainCheck the product version by accessing the AEM Welcome page or the About Adobe Experience Manager option in the Help menu. Identify whether it follows the 6.5.x cycle or the year-based 2024.x cycleAffected if The version displays as 6.5.20 or lower, or as 2024.1 through 2024.4 (if year-based)
-
Confirm DOM-based XSS exposureReview the application's user-generated content handling and any custom components that process URL parameters or form inputs client-side. Look for instances where URL fragments, query parameters, or form data are directly inserted into the DOM without proper sanitizationAffected if The AEM instance hosts custom components or forms that accept user input and render it directly into HTML without encoding, enabling the DOM XSS attack vector
-
Assess user interaction vectorsExamine whether the AEM instance exposes publish-facing forms, comment systems, or pages that could accept malicious links. Check if external URL parameters are used in client-side JavaScriptAffected if The environment allows unauthenticated or low-privileged users to submit content, or exposes pages that accept URL parameters processed by client-side scripts
You are affected if your installed AEM version is 6.5.20 or earlier, or falls between 2024.1 and 2024.4, and your instance processes user input or URL parameters client-side without sanitization.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped6.5.212024.5
Upgrade to AEM 6.5.21 or later to apply the security patch, and implement Content Security Policy (CSP) headers to provide defense-in-depth against XSS attacks.
AEM 6.5.21 or AEM 2024.5 (depending on your release track)
- Upgrade Adobe Experience Manager to version 6.5.21 or later if running 6.5.x release track
- If running the newer release cadence, upgrade to version 2024.5 or later
- After upgrading, verify the installation was successful by checking the AEM version in the About Adobe Experience Manager page
- Review the release notes for the new version to ensure no regressions in your specific configuration
- Test to confirm the DOM-based XSS vulnerability is no longer present
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation4.0 h
- Testing4.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,328.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2024-36224 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2024-36224 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data